Author:
Le Goff Jean-Marie,Ryser Valérie-Anne,Bernardi Laura
Abstract
AbstractThere is a wealth of empirical studies linking the life events and transitions to variations in subjective wellbeing. These studies are often cross sectional or, when taking a dynamic approach, they address one life domain at the time. Within LIVES, the relationship between family transitions (like the transition to parenthood, couple separation, lone motherhood) and well-being has been investigated longitudinally and with attention to the spillovers between the family and other life domains. Several projects show the extent to which family events or phases affect individual subjective wellbeing in the short or long term and what are the interdependencies with employment and health trajectories. Results show also gender differences in the way different types of stressors act and are reacted to. For instance, men and women have different strategies and mobilize different resources and reserves drawing on various life domains (economic, social, cognitive) to deal with stressors related to critical events and transitions. In this chapter, we review and discuss the results of such projects (becoming a parent study, lone motherhood project, etc.) in the light of a multidimensional understanding of vulnerability processes across the life course.
Funder
Swiss National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference36 articles.
1. Almeida, D. M., & Wong, J. D. (2009). Life transitions and daily stress processes. In G. H. Elder & J. Z. Giele (Eds.), The craft of life course research (pp. 141–162). The Guilford Press.
2. Bernardi, L., Bollmann, G., Potarca, G., & Rossier, J. (2017). Multidimensionality of well-being and spillover effects across life domains: How do parenthood and personality affect changes in domain-specific satisfaction? Research in Human Development, 14(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2016.1268893
3. Bernardi, L., Huinink, J., & Settersten, R. A., Jr. (2019). The life course cube: A tool for studying lives. Advances in Life Course Research, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.11.004
4. Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience. Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 1(59), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
5. Carrasco-Campos, A., Almudena, M., & Martinez, L. C. (2017). Quality of life, well-being and social policies in European countries. In A. A. Vilas-Boa (Ed.), Quality of life and quality of working life (pp. 137–149). IntechOpen.