Creative Inquiry in Graphic Design: Studio Habits in an Integrated Arts Project
Author:
Tan Choong Kheng,
Kan Rebecca Yen PeiORCID
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Reference35 articles.
1. Becker, L. (2015). Shifting the pedagogical paradigm. In S. Heller (Ed.), The education of a graphic designer (3rd ed., pp. 51–52). Allworth Press.
2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
3. Bresler, L. (1995). The subservient, co-equal, affective, and social integration styles and their implications for the arts. Arts Education Policy Review, 96(5), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.1995.9934564
4. Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637
5. Cezzar, J. (2020). Teaching the designer of now: A new basis for graphic and communication design education. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.05.002