Abstract
AbstractA construct theory is the story we tell about what it means to move up and down the scale for a variable of interest (e.g., temperature, reading ability, short term memory). Why is it, for example, that items are ordered as they are on the item map? The story evolves as knowledge regarding the construct increases. We call both the process and the product of this evolutionary unfolding "construct definition" (Stenner et al., Journal of Educational Measurement 20:305–316, 1983). Advanced stages of construct definition are characterized by calibration equations (or specification equations) that operationalize and formalize a construct theory. These equations, make point predictions about item behavior or item ensemble distributions. The more closely theoretical calibrations coincide with empirical item difficulties, the more useful the construct theory and the more interesting the story. Twenty-five years of experience in developing the Lexile Framework for Reading enable us to distinguish five stages of thinking. Each subsequent stage can be characterized by an increasingly sophisticated use of substantive theory. Evidence that a construct theory and its associated technologies have reached a given stage or level can be found in the artifacts, instruments, and social networks that are realized at each level.
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Reference10 articles.
1. Ackerman, R. J. (1985). Data, Instruments, and Theory. Princeton.
2. Embretson, S. E. (1998). A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning. Psychological Methods, 3, 380–396.
3. Enright, M. K., & Sheehan, K. M. (2002). Modeling the difficulty of quantitative reasoning items: implications for item generation. In Irvine S. H., & Kyllonen P. C. (Eds) Item Generation for Test Development. Hillsdale, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Stenner, A. J., Burdick, H., Sanford, E., & Burdick, D. How accurate are Lexile text measures? Manuscript accepted. Journal of Applied Measurement.
5. Stenner, A. J., & Smith, M. (1982). Testing construct theories. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 415–426.