Supplementary Measures and Appropriate Safeguards for International Transfers of Health Data After Schrems II

Author:

Corrales Compagnucci Marcelo,Fenwick Mark,Aboy Mateo,Minssen Timo

Abstract

AbstractIn July 2020, the Court of Justiceof the European Union (CJEU) in Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems (“Schrems II”) invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield adequacy decision but found that Standard Contracting Clauses (SCCs) are a valid mechanism to enable GDPR-compliant transfers of personal data from the EU to jurisdictions outside the EU/EEA, as long as various unspecified “supplementary measures” are in place to compensate for any gaps in data protection arising from the third country law or practices. The effect of this decision has been to place regulators, scholars, and data protection professionals under greater pressure to identify and explain these “supplementary measures” to facilitate cross-border transfers of personal data. This chapter critically examines the current framework for cross-border transfers after Schrems II, including the new SCCs adopted by the European Commission, as well as the current European Data Protection Board (EDBP) guidance on “supplementary measures.” We argue that the so-called “supplementary measures” are not “supplementary” and that the CJEU’s characterization of such measures as “supplementary” undermines the original clarity of GDPR with regards to the required standards for the security of processing as well as the available mechanisms for cross-border transfers of personal data. We conclude that despite the legal uncertainty introduced by the CJEU several post-Schrem II developments have been helpful to increase awareness and improve the overall safeguards associated with cross-border transfers of personal data. These include the new SCCs and an increased understanding of the capabilities and limitations of the technical and organizational measures, including encryption, pseudonymization, and multi-party processing. Technical solutions such as multiparty homomorphic encryption (HE) that combine these three technical measures while still allowing for the possibility to query and analyze encrypted data without decrypting it has significant potential to provide effective security measures that facilitate cross-border transfers of personal data in high-risk settings.

Publisher

Springer Nature Singapore

Reference29 articles.

1. Article 29 data protection working party, adequacy referential (updated), WP 254 at 2 (6 February 2018). https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/item-detail.cfm?item_id=614108. Accessed 17 Aug 2022

2. Bradford L, Aboy M, Liddell K (2020) International transfers of health data between the EU and USA: a sector-specific approach for the USA to ensure an ‘adequate’ level of protection. J Law Biosci 7(1):1–33

3. Bradford L, Aboy M, Liddell K (2021) Standard contractual clauses for cross-border transfers of health data after Schrems II. J Law Biosci 8(1):1–36

4. Braun M et al (2021) European Commission adopts and publishes new standard contractual clauses for international transfers of personal data. https://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/blogs/wilmerhale-privacy-and-cybersecurity-law/20210607-european-commission-adopts-and-publishes-new-standard-contractual-clauses-for-international-transfers-of-personal-data. Accessed 17 Aug 2021

5. Christakis T, Terpan F (2021) EU-US negotiations on law enforcement access to data: divergences, challenges and EU law procedures and options. Int Data Priv Law 11(2):81–106

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3