Abstract
Abstract
Background
The availability of fine-grained, culture-specific psychometric outcomes can favor the interpretation of scores of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the most frequently used instrument to screen for mild cognitive dysfunctions in both instrumental and non-instrumental domains. This study thus aimed at providing: (i) updated, region-specific norms for the Italian MoCA, by also (ii) comparing them to pre-existing ones with higher geographical coverage; (iii) information on sensitivity and discriminative capability at the item level.
Methods
Five hundred and seventy nine healthy individuals from Northern Italy (208 males, 371 females; age: 63.4 ± 15, 21–96; education: 11.3 ± 4.6, 1–25) were administered the MoCA. Item Response Theory (IRT) was adopted to assess item difficulty and discrimination. Normative values were derived by means of the Equivalent Scores (ESs) method, applied to the MoCA and its sub-scales. Average ESs were also computed. Agreement with previous ESs classification was assessed via Cohen’s k.
Results
Age and education significantly predicted all MoCA measures except for Orientation, which was related to age only. No sex differences were detected when tested along with age and education. Substantial disagreements with previous ESs classifications were detected. Several items proved to be scarcely sensitive, especially the place item from Orientation and the letter detection task. Memory items showed high discriminative capability, along with certain items assessing executive functions and orientation.
Discussion
Item-level information herewith provided for the Italian MoCA can help interpret its scores by Italian practitioners. Italian practitioners should consider an adaptive use of region-specific norms for the MoCA.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Milano - Bicocca
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Ageing
Reference50 articles.
1. Mitrushina M (2009) Cognitive screening methods. In: Grant I, Adams KM (eds) Neuropsychological Assessment of Neuropsychiatric and Neuromedical Disorders. Oxford University Press, pp 101–126
2. Tsoi KK, Chan JY, Hirai HW et al (2015) Cognitive tests to detect dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 175:1450–1458
3. Trzepacz PT, Hochstetler H, Wang S et al (2015) Relationship between the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-mental State Examination for assessment of mild cognitive impairment in older adults. BMC Geriatr 15:1–9
4. Trevethan R (2017) Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values: foundations, pliabilities, and pitfalls in research and practice. Front Public Health 5:307
5. Willmes K (2010) The methodological and statistical foundations of neuropsychological assessment. In: Gurd J, Kischka U, Marshall J (eds) The Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, New York, pp 28–49
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献