Abstract
Abstract
This study newly investigated the joint contribution of metamemory and personality (traits and facets) in explaining episodic memory (EM) performance in typically aging older adults. Forty-eight participants (age range: 64–75 years) completed a self-paced word list (SPWL) recall task, a metamemory questionnaire assessing perceived control and potential improvement (PCPI) and self-efficacy and satisfaction (SESA) regarding one’s mental abilities (e.g., memory), and the Big-Five Questionnaire. Based on the SPWL encoding strategies reported, participants were then classified as effective (N = 20) or ineffective (N = 28) memory strategy users. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that a better SPWL performance was predicted by higher levels of PCPI, Scrupulousness and Dominance personality facets. Effective memory strategy users, then, showed higher SPWL performance and Dominance (Energy facet) than ineffective ones. These findings suggest that both specific metamemory processes and personality facets predict better EM performance in older adults. Moreover, personality dispositions relating to Dominance seem to characterize individuals adopting effective memory strategies to support EM performance. These results represent first evidence of the role of both metamemory and personality—facets—in explaining older adults’ EM performance, which should thus be considered when assessing or training EM in old age.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Padova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging
Reference39 articles.
1. Craik FI, Salthouse TA (2011) The Handbook of Aging and Cognition. Psychology Press, London, United Kingdom
2. Hertzog C, Dixon RA, Hultsch DF (1990) Metamemory in adulthood: differentiating knowledge, belief, and behavior. In: Hess TM (ed) Aging and Cognition: knowledge organization and utilization. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp 161–212
3. Sella E, Carbone E, Vincenzi M et al (2022) Efficacy of memory training interventions targeting metacognition for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Ment Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2022.2122931
4. Hertzog C, Dixon RA (1994) Metacognitive development in adulthood and old age. In; Metcarfle J, Shimamura AP, editors. Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. MIT press, Massachussets p.227–251
5. Lineweaver TT, Hertzog C (1998) Adults’ efficacy and control beliefs regarding memory and aging: separating general from personal beliefs. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 5:264–296. https://doi.org/10.1076/anec.5.4.264.771
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献