Automated cars meet human drivers: responsible human-robot coordination and the ethics of mixed traffic

Author:

Nyholm Sven,Smids Jilles

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we discuss the ethics of automated driving. More specifically, we discuss responsible human-robot coordination within mixed traffic: i.e. traffic involving both automated cars and conventional human-driven cars. We do three main things. First, we explain key differences in robotic and human agency and expectation-forming mechanisms that are likely to give rise to compatibility-problems in mixed traffic, which may lead to crashes and accidents. Second, we identify three possible solution-strategies for achieving better human-robot coordination within mixed traffic. Third, we identify important ethical challenges raised by each of these three possible strategies for achieving optimized human-robot cordination in this domain. Among other things, we argue that we should not just explore ways of making robotic driving more like human driving. Rather, we ought also to take seriously potential ways (e.g. technological means) of making human driving more like robotic driving. Nor should we assume that complete automation is always the ideal to aim for; in some traffic-situations, the best results may be achieved through human-robot collaboration. Ultimately, our main aim in this paper is to argue that the new field of the ethics of automated driving needs take seriously the ethics of mixed traffic and responsible human-robot coordination.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference43 articles.

1. Arkin, R. (2010). The case for ethical autonomy in unmanned systems. Journal of Military Ethics, 9(4), 332–341.

2. Bostrom, N., & Ord, T. (2006). The reversal test: Eliminating status quo bias in applied ethics. Ethics 116, 656–679.

3. Bradshaw, J., Hoffman, R., Johnson, M., & Woods, D. (2013). The seven deadly myths of “autonomous systems”. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28, 54–61.

4. Bradshaw-Martin, H., & Easton, C. (2014). Autonomous or “driverless” cars and disability: A legal and ethical analysis. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 20(3). Retrieved from http://webjcli.org/article/view/344 .

5. Färber, B. (2016). Communication and communication problems between autonomous vehicles and human drivers. In M. Maurer, J. C. Gerdes, B. Lenz, & H. Winner (Eds.), Autonomous Driving (pp. 125–144). Berlin: Springer.

Cited by 37 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Machines meet humans on the social road: Risk implications;Risk Analysis;2023-11-16

2. In bot we trust? Personality traits and reciprocity in human-bot trust games;Frontiers in Behavioral Economics;2023-08-28

3. An Analysis of Opinions on AI Ethics Based on Network Motifs using the Case Method;Proceedings of the 2023 12th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications;2023-02-23

4. Human–machine coordination in mixed traffic as a problem of Meaningful Human Control;AI & SOCIETY;2023-02-07

5. Safety First. Old and New Risks;Ethics of Driving Automation;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3