Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To compare differences in outcome in skeletal and dental parameters in hypo- and hyperdivergent Class II patients after extraction of upper first premolars and comprehensive orthodontic treatment.
Materials and methods
37 Class-II-patients with dental camouflage treatment were divided into a hypo- (n = 18) or a hyperdivergent (n = 19) group depending on the mandibular plane angle (hypo: < 34° or hyper: ≥ 34°). Lateral cephalograms were available before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and were analyzed with customized measurements. Data from a growth survey served as a control and were used to calculate the actual treatment effect. Data were analyzed by one-sample Student’s t-tests and independent Student’s t-tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
The measurements showed similar changes in both groups. The effects were mainly dentoalveolar. Hypodivergent patients showed an almost equal increase in anterior and posterior facial height, while hyperdivergent patients only showed an increase in anterior facial height.
Conclusions
In hyperdivergent patients, the anterior facial height increases despite camouflage treatment. This indicates a tendency towards bite opening and backward rotation of the mandible. Hypodivergent patients do not experience deepening of the bite.
Clinical relevance
In hyperdivergent patients with upper first premolars extraction the anterior facial height increased differently than in hypodivergent patients. This should be considered if a bite opening is a possible contraindication to treatment.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Moyers RE (1988) Handbook of orthodontics. Year Book Med Publishers, Chicago
2. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM (2007) Contemporary Orthodontics. Elsevier, Oxford
3. McSherry PF, Bradley H (2000) Class II correction-reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques. J Orthod 27:219–225
4. Pancherz H, Ruf S (2008) The Herbst Appliance: Research-Based Clinical Mangement. Quintessence, Chicago
5. Rogers K, Campbell PM, Tadlock L, Schneiderman E, Buschang PH (2018) Treatment changes of hypo- and hyperdivergent Class II Herbst patients. Angle Orthod 88:3–9
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献