Abstract
AbstractThis paper investigates the use of metrics to recruit professors for academic positions. We analyzed confidential reports with candidate evaluations in economics, sociology, physics, and informatics at the University of Oslo between 2000 and 2017. These unique data enabled us to explore how metrics were applied in these evaluations in relation to other assessment criteria. Despite being important evaluation criteria, metrics were seldom the most salient criteria in candidate evaluations. Moreover, metrics were applied chiefly as a screening tool to decrease the number of eligible candidates and not as a replacement for peer review. Contrary to the literature suggesting an escalation of metrics, we foremost detected stable assessment practices with only a modestly increased reliance on metrics. In addition, the use of metrics proved strongly dependent on disciplines where the disciplines applied metrics corresponding to their evaluation cultures. These robust evaluation practices provide an empirical example of how core university processes are chiefly characterized by path-dependency mechanisms, and only moderately by isomorphism. Additionally, the disciplinary-dependent spread of metrics offers a theoretical illustration of how travelling standards such as metrics are not only diffused but rather translated to fit the local context, resulting in heterogeneity and context-dependent spread.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Education
Reference66 articles.
1. Aagaard, Kaare. 2015. How incentives trickle down: Local use of a national bibliometric indicator system. Science and Public Policy 42: 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu087.
2. Aksnes, Dag W., Liv Langfeldt, and Paul Wouters. 2019. Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575.
3. Altbach, Philip G., Maria Yudkevich, and Laura E. Rumbley. 2015. Academic inbreeding: local challenge, global problem. Asia Pacific Education Review 16: 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9391-8.
4. Baert, Patrick, and Alan Shipman. 2005. University under siege? European Societies 7(1): 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575.
5. Becher, Tony, and Paul Trowler. 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories. Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. New York: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献