Abstract
AbstractAgricultural extension, or advisory services, have a key role to play in supporting farmers’ learning and adoption of new practices and technologies. This paper analyses gaps and needs which require addressing in order for extension systems to more effectively contribute to the upscaling of ecological intensification approaches in East African smallholder agriculture. Our starting point is the push-pull technology (PPT), a promising approach. PPT originated in East Africa and is being continuously improved through cycles of interdisciplinary and participatory experimentation. Despite well-documented benefits to farmers and the environment, more institutional support from agricultural extension systems (AES) is needed for PPT to realise significant impact on poverty reduction, food security, and sustainability. Departing from this assessment, we review literature on AES in five East African countries. After clarifying the AES characteristics that ecological intensification requires, emphasising the capacity to embrace complexity, we identify four thematic areas that are in urgent need of attention: first, widely recognised problems with access and inclusiveness have seen welcome innovation but remain substantial. Second, information and communication technologies provide many benefits and new possibilities, but expectations must be tempered. Third, pluralistic AES present coordination challenges that risk undermining and misdirecting extension. Finally, the political-economic underpinnings of extension require critical scrutiny and strategic interventions. While many challenges threaten extension effectiveness broadly, we highlight implications for ecological intensification approaches like PPT. Our insights thus speak to the broader question of how to design and implement extension for sustainable agricultural development in East Africa.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Lund University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Development,Food Science
Reference218 articles.
1. Abate, G. T., Dereje, M., Hirvonen, K., & Minten, B. (2020). Geography of public service delivery in rural Ethiopia. World Development, 136, 105133.
2. Abdu-Raheem, K. A., & Worth, S. (2017). Developing a framework for good national extension policy: A study of the Eastern African countries. Tropical Agriculture, 94(1), 85–98.
3. Abebaw, D., & Haile, M. G. (2013). The impact of cooperatives on agricultural technology adoption: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Food Policy, 38, 82–91.
4. Abi, M., Kessler, A., Oosterveer, P., & Tolossa, D. (2019). Adapting the current mass mobilization approach in Ethiopia to enhance its impact on sustainable land management: Lessons from the Sago-kara watershed. Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 109336.
5. Abresparr, S. (2015). Perceptions of change : livelihood impacts of the Push-Pull Technology Project in South Wollo, Ethiopia. Bachelor’s thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Uppsala, Sweden.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献