Abstract
AbstractThe rapid evolution of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, with ever more profound implications for humans and societies, has triggered visions and initiatives to re-align the Next-Generation IoT with what works for humans and humanity first. However, despite the increased push towards “human-centric” IoT, it is still poorly understood what “human-centric” actually means in this context, how it is interpreted and embedded into the design, by whom, and for which purposes. To address these questions, we conducted a systematic literature review (N = 84) on the theory, principles, and design requirements of human-centric IoT. A key observation is that, despite the recent increase in research on humane perspectives for IoT, “human-centredness” often still seems to be used primarily as a label and overarching paradigm, not leading to a profound change in the underlying practices. We found no shared understanding of what “human-centric” implies in this context or common agreement on which principles human-centric IoT should be built upon. Furthermore, our analysis confirmed the predominance of technology-oriented fields, with a traditional approach towards user involvement and limited involvement of other disciplines. Overall, our findings point towards an apparent discrepancy between how contributions are positioned and framed (“human-centric”), the practices and assumptions they are based on, and their actual impact and ability to orient existing efforts towards genuine human-centric outcomes and key values. Based on the results, we formulate directions for future research aimed at building a more human-centric and empowering IoT.
Funder
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference166 articles.
1. Adamo A (2019) Taming the techno leviathan: why we should adopt a society-in-the-loop model inside IoT utilities. AISEM annual conference on sensors and microsystems. Springer, Cham, pp 119–129
2. Aljeraisy A, Barati M, Rana O, Perera C (2021) Privacy laws and privacy by design schemes for the Internet of Things: a developer’s perspective. ACM Comput Surv (Csur) 54(5):1–38
3. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The Internet of Things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805
4. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G, Nitti M (2012) The social Internet of Things (siot)-when social networks meet the Internet of Things: concept, architecture and network characterization. Comput Netw 56(16):3594–3608
5. Azimi I, Rahmani AM, Liljeberg P, Tenhunen H (2017) Internet of Things for remote elderly monitoring: a study from user-centered perspective. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 8(2):273–289
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献