Author:
Julien Marit,Roehrs Dorian
Abstract
AbstractThis paper discusses the morpho-syntax of phrasal proper names like Deutsche Bahn ‘German Railway’ and Norske Skog ‘Norwegian Forest’ in German and Norwegian. As regards determiner elements, there are three types of phrasal proper names in German: some proper names do not have a definite article, some do, and yet others exhibit a possessive. Depending on the syntactic context, the first two types pattern the same as regards the presence or absence of the article but contrast with the third, where the possessive is always present. It is proposed that proper names in German vary in their structure as regards the presence of the DP-level: unlike articles, possessives have a referential marker, and a DP is obligatorily projected with the latter element. Norwegian is different. While proper names in Norwegian also vary in the presence or absence of determiners, there is no flexibility—determiners are always present or always absent, independent of the syntactic context. It is proposed that unlike in German, the DP-level in Norwegian is always present. As argued by Roehrs (Glossa J Gen Linguist, 5(1):1–38, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1267), phrasal proper names involve a regular syntactic derivation. Given that elements of regular DPs are sensitive to definiteness in Norwegian, it is proposed that Norwegian proper names involve an obligatory definiteness feature. As this feature surfaces in the DP-level, the latter must be present in that language in all instances. Besides this cross-linguistic difference, we document that phrasal PN may show features of recursivity evidenced most clearly in Norwegian.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference89 articles.
1. Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI3104085. Accessed 10 January 2022.
2. Alexiadou, Artemis. 2005. Possessors and (in)definiteness. Lingua 115: 787–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2004.01.005.
3. Alexiadou, Artemis. 2019. Proper name compounds: a comparative perspective. English Language and Linguistics 23(4): 855–877. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674319000236.
4. Alexiadou, Artemis, Liliane Haegeman, and Melita Stavrou. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207491.
5. Allerton, D.J. 1987. The linguistic and sociolinguistic status of proper names. What are they, and who do they belong to? Journal of Pragmatics 11: 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90153-6.