Association of hospital volume with survival but not with postoperative mortality in glioblastoma patients in Belgium

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Standard of care treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) involves surgical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy. However, variations in treatment decisions and outcomes exist across hospitals and physicians. In Belgium, where oncological care is dispersed, the impact of hospital volume on GBM outcomes remains unexplored. This nationwide study aims to analyse interhospital variability in 30-day postoperative mortality and 1-/2-year survival for GBM patients. Methods Data collected from the Belgian Cancer Registry, identified GBM patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2019. Surgical resection and biopsy cases were identified, and hospital case load was determined. Associations between hospital volume and mortality and survival probabilities were analysed, considering patient characteristics. Statistical analysis included logistic regression for mortality and Cox proportional hazard models for survival. Results A total of 2269 GBM patients were identified (1665 underwent resection, 662 underwent only biopsy). Thirty-day mortality rates post-resection/post-biopsy were 5.1%/11.9% (target < 3%/<5%). Rates were higher in elderly patients and those with worse WHO-performance scores. No significant difference was found based on hospital case load. Survival probabilities at 1/2 years were 48.6% and 21.3% post-resection; 22.4% and 8.3% post-biopsy. Hazard ratio for all-cause death for low vs. high volume centres was 1.618 in first 0.7 year post-resection (p < 0.0001) and 1.411 in first 0.8 year post-biopsy (p = 0.0046). Conclusion While 30-day postoperative mortality rates were above predefined targets, no association between hospital volume and mortality was found. However, survival probabilities demonstrated benefits from treatment in higher volume centres, particularly in the initial months post-surgery. These variations highlight the need for continuous improvement in neuro-oncological practice and should stimulate reflection on the neuro-oncological care organisation in Belgium.