Abstract
AbstractThe literature on tax competition has argued that tax base equalization, which reduces regional disparities in tax bases, can serve as a means of internalizing horizontal and vertical fiscal externalities. This argument assumes that each government relies on a single tax base (a regional tax on mobile capital and a federal tax on savings). This paper considers the case in which a distortionary labor tax is also available. Internalizing fiscal externalities requires that while the regional capital tax base is fully equalized, a region’s equalization entitlement for the labor tax is positive when its tax base is “larger” than the average tax base of all regions. This efficient tax base equalization system is incompatible with the primary objective of fiscal equalization.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference30 articles.
1. Boadway, R., & Keen, M. (1996). Efficiency and the optimal direction of federal-state transfers. International Tax and Public Finance, 3, 137–155.
2. Bucovetsky, S., & Smart, M. (2006). The efficiency consequences of local revenue equalization: Tax competition and tax distortions. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8, 119–144.
3. Bucovetsky, S., & Wilson, J. D. (1991). Tax competition with two tax instruments. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21, 333–350.
4. Büttner, T. (2006). The incentive effect of fiscal equalization transfers on tax policy. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 477–497.
5. Dafflon, B. (2007). Fiscal capacity equalization in horizontal and fiscal equalization programs. In R. Boadway & A. Shah (Eds.), Intergovernmental fiscal transfers. The World Bank.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献