Abstract
AbstractThe Australian education system features considerable socioeconomic inequality and is a frequent source of controversy in Australian public life. Yet meaningful reform to this system has proven elusive. In this article, we examine the public’s fairness perceptions of educational inequality based on parental financial capacity, using an online survey of adults (N = 1,999) from New South Wales, Australia. We asked about the fairness of inequality in school resources and education quality, and used a scenario in which students from high-income and low-income families had achievement gaps due to differences in educational experiences. Respondents had diverse perceptions about the fairness of educational inequality, but most perceived the scenario as unfair or very unfair. The partial proportional odds models showed that self-interest and neoliberal orientations predicted people’s fairness perceptions of educational inequality. The findings of this study have implications for achieving meaningful reform of the Australian education system that is in line with public opinion.
Funder
The Gonski Institute for Education at UNSW Sydney
University of New South Wales
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Abowitz, K. K., & Stitzlein, S. M. (2018). Public schools, public goods, and public work. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(3), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718808262
2. Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G.-M. (2005). Fairness and redistribution. American Economic Review, 95(4), 960–980. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825655
3. Amable, B. (2010). Morals and politics in the ideology of neo-liberalism. Socio-Economic Review, 9(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwq015
4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). 2016 Census QuickStats. https://quickstats.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/quickstat/1
5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). 3218.0: Regional Population Growth, Australia, 2016–2017. https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3218.02016-17?OpenDocument
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献