Abstract
AbstractStudent experience of Assessment for Learning (AfL) pedagogies ideally provides multiple entry points for students to take past learning forward into future learning. In practice, points of disconnection may confound the accessibility of AfL’s repertoire of practices. This paper investigates the AfL experiences of students with likely language and attentional difficulties and their peers in three Australian secondary schools. Ninety-two students shared their insights in interviews and focus groups, with data analysed abductively through a conceptual frame of six dimensions. Common practical effects for students included recognition and value of a range of teacher practices. Students with language and attentional difficulties indicated more uneven recall of processes, especially when teacher practice of AfL was fragmented and classroom routines prioritised summative assessment. Fragmentation in turn compromised the emotional and evaluative dimensions of experience that catalyse continuity in learning. Critical insights from students about how they searched for and secured cohesive experiences points to how AfL offers agentic possibilities for learning beyond the immediate activities of the classroom.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Queensland University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference93 articles.
1. Aarskog, E. (2020). ‘No assessment, no learning’ exploring student participation in assessment in Norwegian physical education (PE). Sport, Education and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1791064
2. Acocella, I. (2012). The focus groups in social research: advantages and disadvantages. Quality & Quantity, 46, 1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9600-4
3. Adie, L., Willis, J., & Van der Kleij, F. (2018). Diverse perspectives on student agency inclassroom assessment: Introduction to special issue. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0262-2
4. Allal, L. (2016). The co-regulation of student learning in an assessment for learning culture. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: meeting the challenge of implementation. (Vol. 4). Springer.
5. Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2019). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992