The Late and Final Middle Palaeolithic of Central Europe and Its Contributions to the Formation of the Regional Upper Palaeolithic: a Review and a Synthesis

Author:

Jöris OlafORCID,Neruda PetrORCID,Wiśniewski AndrzejORCID,Weiss MarcelORCID

Abstract

Abstract For decades, the relationship of pre-modern hominins to anatomically modern humans (AMH) and the transition from mode 3 to mode 4 industries remain topics of ongoing scientific debate. Over the last 20 years, different disciplines have added new data and much detail to these questions, highlighting the demographic and social and cultural complexity underlaying these major changes or turnovers in human evolution. As with most other regions outside Africa, archaeologists faced long-lasting discussions whether or not the central European archaeological record is to be understood as a regional transition from the Middle Palaeolithic (MP) to the Upper Palaeolithic (UP) or if it is characterised by the replacement of Neanderthal MP techno-complexes by industries of overall UP character imported by modern humans. These debates have been re-fuelled by the discoveries of new sites, of new hominin fossil remains and by aDNA studies pinpointing towards the arrival of AMH in Europe several millennia earlier than previously thought (Slimak et al., Science Advances,8, eabj9496, 2022; Hajdinjak et al., Nature,592, 253-257, 2021; Prüfer et al., Nature Ecology & Evolution,5, 820–825, 2021). Together with new radiometric age-estimates and detailed archaeological site studies, these developments call to recapture the present knowledge of the Late (LMP) and Final Middle Palaeolithic (FMP) of central Europe, viewed from the perspective of lithic technology and typology, raw material exploitation and land-use strategies. We will review and characterise this record as it represents the demographic and cultural substrate that AMH had met and will discuss to which degree this substrate contributed to the formation of the central European UP.

Funder

Narodowym Centrum Nauki

Ministerstvo Kultury

Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum – Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Archäologie

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Computer Science

Reference335 articles.

1. Abadi, I., Bar-Yosef, O., & Belfer-Cohen, A. (2020). Kebara V – A contribution for the study of the Middle-Upper Paleolithic transition in the Levant. PaleoAnthropology, 2020, 1–28.

2. Adam, K. D. (1951). Der Waldelefant von Lehringen, eine Jagdbeute des diluvialen Menschen. Quartär, 5, 79–92.

3. Adams, B. (2007). Gulyás Archaeology: The Szeletian and the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in Hungary and central Europe. In J. Riel-Salvatore & G. Clark (Eds.), New approaches to the study of the Early Upper Paleolithic ‘transitional’ industries of western Eurasia. BAR International Series 160 (pp. 90–110). Hadrian Books.

4. Adams, B. (2009). The Bükk Mountain Szeletian: Old and new views on “transitional” material from the eponymous site of the Szeletian. In M. Camps & P. Cauhan (Eds.), Sourcebook of Paleolithic transitions: Methods, theories, and interpretations (pp. 427–440). Springer.

5. Adler, D. S., Wilkinson, K. N., Blockley, S., Mark, D. F., Pinhasi, R., Schmidt-Magee, B. A., Nahapetyan, S., Mallol, C., Berna, F., Glauberman, J. P., Raczynski-Henk, Y., Wales, N., Frahm, E., Jöris, O., MacLeod, A., Smith, V. C., Cullen, V. L., & Gasparian, B. (2014). Early Levallois technology and the Lower to Middle Paleolithic transition in the Southern Caucasus. Science, 345, 1609–1613.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3