Abstract
AbstractThe present study examines the influence of individual competencies on knowledge integration in inter- and transdisciplinary work. Perspective taking, reflexivity, analogical reasoning, and tolerance of ambiguity and uncertainty were investigated as core competencies for fostering knowledge integration. Additional hypotheses assumed that the positive effects are valid in the scientific and economic contexts and that individual competencies predict knowledge integration at different levels of expertise. To test the hypotheses, 421 participants, comprised of students (N = 165) and individuals working in science (N = 152) and economics (N = 104), answered questionnaires on knowledge integration and competencies of knowledge integration in an online survey. Further questions collected demographic data and inquired about experience and expertise in inter- and transdisciplinary work. The main result was that all postulated competencies positively related to knowledge integration. Analogical reasoning and perspective taking showed the strongest relationships with knowledge integration. Further results show that all competencies are positively related to knowledge integration in the student and expert sample, yet the interrelationships differ between the scientific and economic sample. This investigation into the competencies of knowledge integration contributes to the education of inter- and transdisciplinarians in academia and business practice.
Funder
Ministerium für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
Fachhochschule Dortmund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference76 articles.
1. Augsburg, T. (2014). Becoming transdisciplinary: The emergence of the transdisciplinary individual. World Futures, 70(3–4), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2014.934639
2. Balsiger, P. W. (2005). Transdisziplinarität: systematisch-vergleichende Untersuchung disziplinenübergreifender Wissenschaftspraxis [Transdisciplinarity: systematic-comparative study of cross-disciplinary scientific practice]. Berlin: Fink.
3. Bammer, G. (2006). Integration and implementation sciences: Building a new specialisation. Ecology and Society. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01360-100206
4. Bammer, G. (2018). Tools for transdiscilinary research. In D. Fam, J. Palmer, C. Riedy, & C. Mitchell (Eds.), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability outcomes (pp. 39–54). Routledge.
5. Bammer, G. (2019). What makes a researcher transdisciplinary? A framework to identify expertise: Frameworks for transdisciplinary research # 8. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 28(3), 9. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.3.2