Determination of Quality in Training Programs Based on Outcomes and Data

Author:

Conrad-Schnetz Kristen,Anand Rahul J.,Relles Daniel,Hilt Elizabeth K.,Ghanem Yazid K.,Joshi Amit R. T.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review Measuring quality of surgical training programs is fundamental in recruitment, program improvement, and accreditation. There are several resources available that can provide useful data and information for programs, medical students, and preliminary residents to evaluate program quality. The purpose of this review is to summarize both public and private data. Recent Findings Privately available data largely consist of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) resident and faculty surveys, Letter of Notification, and Case Log reports as well as the American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Exam scores. Publicly available data include program accreditation status, and ABS Qualifying and Certifying Exam first-time pass rates. Medical students and preliminary residents can use resources such as social media platforms and internet-based sources to gain more information. Lastly, program leadership can drive innovation into their curricula utilizing platforms such as the Educational Quality Improvement Program (EQIP). Summary Increasing access to data is allowing educators to apply quality-improvement methodology to their training programs. Utilizing all available data will allow high-quality continuous improvement in the curricula development of surgical training programs.

Funder

Rowan University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference52 articles.

1. •ACGME. 2022. ACGME Data Resource Book. ACGME. Accessed August 11, 2023. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/publicationsbooks/2021-2022_acgme__databook_document.pdf This reference provides access to national level publicly available data regarding program performance

2. Swanson AG. The genesis of the Coordinating Council on Medical Education and the Liaison Committee on Graduate Medical Education. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1974;50(11):1216–21.

3. MacEachern MT. Criteria for graduate training for surgery and a manual of graduate training for surgery. Bull Am Coll Surg. 1939;24:6–13.

4. Potts JR 3rd. Surgical program accreditation and case logs: What is the meaning of the minima? J Am Coll Surg. 2019;229(4):431–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.05.019.

5. Holden WD. The Conference Committee on Graduate Education in Surgery. Surgery. 1968;64(2):506–8.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3