Abstract
Abstract
Puropse
The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensory processing skills, quality of life and balance performance in adult cochlear implant users.
Methods
A sample of 40 individuals was studied in two groups; 20 normal hearing individuals (37.84 ± 15.39 years old) and 20 cochlear implant users (35.58 ± 11.22 year old). Balance performance was assessed by Computerized Dynamic Posturography. The Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile completed by the individual was used to assess sensory processing skills. Finally, quality of life was assessed with the Short Form-36.
Results
Among the different sensory processing parameters in the adolescent/adult sensory profile, a significant difference was found between the two groups in the parameters of low registration, sensory sensitivity and sensory avoidance (p < .05). Visual, vestibular and composite scores were found to be lower in cochlear implant users by Computerised Dynamic Posturography assessment (p < .05). When assessing quality of life, emotional well-being and social functioning parameters were found to be lower in cochlear implant users (p < .05).
Conclusion
Factors such as the inability to reach sufficient auditory stimuli due to hearing loss and the occurrence of vestibular problems after cochlear implant surgery limit the quantity and quality of sensory stimuli from the environment. Individuals with cochlear implants may prefer to live isolated from society because they cannot adequately process incoming sensory stimuli due to hearing/balance problems, and this may negatively affect the quality of life of individuals. Our findings revealed the necessity of multisensory assessment and therapy protocols when rehabilitating individuals with cochlear implants.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Brown C et al (2001) The adult sensory profile: measuring patterns of sensory processing. Am J Occup Therapy 55(1):75–82. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.55.1.75
2. Arnwine B (2007) Starting Sensory Integration Therapy: Fun Activities that Won’t Destroy Your Home Or Classroom! Future Horizons
3. Kranowitz CS (2006) The out-of-sync child: recognizing and coping with sensory processing disorder. Penguin
4. Bundy AC, Lane SJ, Murray EA (2002) Sensory Integration: Theory and Practice, (Second Edition, pp.85–135)
5. Asai M et al (1993) Evaluation of vestibular function by dynamic posturography and other equilibrium examinations. Acta Otolaryngol 113(sup504):120–124. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489309128136