Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Wrong-site surgeries are rare but potentially serious clinical errors. Marking the surgical site is crucial to preventing errors, but is hindered in the ENT field by the presence of many internal organs. In addition, there is no standardized marking procedure.
Methods
Here, an ENT surgical-marking procedure was developed and introduced at a clinic. The procedure was evaluated through anonymized questionnaires. This study was conducted over a 6-month period by interviewing patients and, at the beginning and end of this period, doctors and other surgical staff.
Results
The internal organ-marking problem was solved by applying a fixed abbreviation for each procedure onto the shoulder in addition to marking the skin surface as close to the organ as possible. The procedure was described as practicable by 100% of the interviewees; 75% of the ENT physicians and 96.3% of the other surgical staff considered the procedure highly important for preventing site confusion, and 75% of the physicians had a consequently greater feeling of safety. Of the 248 patients surveyed, 96.0% considered the marking procedure useful, and 75.8% had a consequently greater feeling of safety. For 52.0%, the marking reduced their fear of the operation.
Conclusions
For the first time, a standardized procedure was developed to mark the site of ENT surgery directly, uniformly and safely on patients. The procedure was judged to be useful and practicable and was also deemed crucial for preventing site confusion. Patients felt safer and less fearful of the operation due to the marking.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology
Reference25 articles.
1. Algie CM, Mahar RK, Wasiak J, Batty L, Gruen RL, Mahar PD (2015) Interventions for reducing wrong-site surgery and invasive clinical procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009404.pub3
2. Giles SJ, Rhodes P, Clements G, Cook GA, Hayton R, Maxwell MJ, Sheldon TA, Wright J (2006) Experience of wrong site surgery and surgical marking practices among clinicians in the UK. Qual Saf Health Care 15:363–368
3. Devine J, Chutkan N, Norvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) Avoiding wrong site surgery: a systematic review. Spine 35:S28-36
4. Renner D, Fishman L, Lessing C (2012) Reducing the risk of wrong site surgeries: In the international project "Action on Patient Safety: High 5s," 16 German hospitals are committed to avoiding wrong site surgeries. Dtsch Arztebl A 1016–1018
5. Shah RK, Kentala E, Healy GB, Roberson DW (2004) Classification and consequences of errors in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope 114:1322–1335