Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Adenoid hypertrophy is one of the main causes of nasal obstruction in ‘children. Adenoid hypertrophy can be approached either with nasal corticosteroids, or surgically when medical treatment fails. Different adenoidectomy techniques have been proposed to reduce morbidity and surgical risks, with a consequent marked increase in the use of new surgical procedures in recent years, with a progressive increase in the use of coblation. This state-of-the-art review aims to systematically review the current literature on the role of coblation in adenoidectomy.
Methods
The selection criteria included children submitted to adenoidectomy with coblator vs other techniques. 11 research questions were defined. 4 databases were explored by four authors: PubMed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and SciELO. The level of evidence and quality of the selected articles were assessed according to assessed according to the Quality Assessment Checklist of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
Results
20 studies met the inclusion criteria: 2 metanalysis, 12 randomized clinical trial, 2 non-randomized clinical trial, 1 prospective cohort study, and 3 retrospective cohort study. It encompassed a total population of 8375 participants. Regarding the different surgical techniques, 18 studies (excluding metanalysis) performed coblation (n = 1550), 6 microdebridement (n = 883), 15 curettage (n = 4016), and 1 suction coagulation (n = 1926).
Conclusion
Coblator adenoidectomy appears to offer better adenoid control compared to curettage, with a possible, although not confirmed lower rate of revision surgery. Similarly, this greater resection of adenoid tissue seems to be related to a greater reduction of nasal obstruction. The advantages of this technique are mainly less surgical bleeding—although it is not clear this is a clinically relevant difference, and less postoperative pain compared to cold curettage. The difference in pain is small, as adenoidectomy is not a painful surgery in general. There is little evidence on the control of OME and comparison with other techniques such as microdebrider adenoidectomy.
Funder
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology
Reference43 articles.
1. Pereira L, Monyror J, Almeida FT, Almeida FR, Guerra E, Flores-Mir C et al (2018) Prevalence of adenoid hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev 38:101–112
2. Isaac A, Major M, Witmans M, Alrajhi Y, Flores-Mir C, Major P et al (2015) Correlations between acoustic rhinometry, subjective symptoms, and endoscopic findings in symptomatic children with nasal obstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(6):550–555
3. Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, César JA, Chadha NK (2008) Intranasal corticosteroids for nasal airway obstruction in children with moderate to severe adenoidal hypertrophy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008(3):CD006286
4. McDermott KW, Liang L (2021) Overview of major ambulatory surgeries performed in hospital-owned facilities, 2019. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
5. 2021 [cited 2023 Jun 18]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK577044/