Coblator adenoidectomy in pediatric patients: a state-of-the-art review

Author:

Calvo-Henriquez ChristianORCID,RuedaFernandez-Rueda María,Garcia-Lliberos Ainhoa,Maldonado-Alvarado Byron,Mota-Rojas Xenia,Maniaci Antonino,Iannella Giannicola,Jimenez-Huerta Ignacio

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Adenoid hypertrophy is one of the main causes of nasal obstruction in ‘children. Adenoid hypertrophy can be approached either with nasal corticosteroids, or surgically when medical treatment fails. Different adenoidectomy techniques have been proposed to reduce morbidity and surgical risks, with a consequent marked increase in the use of new surgical procedures in recent years, with a progressive increase in the use of coblation. This state-of-the-art review aims to systematically review the current literature on the role of coblation in adenoidectomy. Methods The selection criteria included children submitted to adenoidectomy with coblator vs other techniques. 11 research questions were defined. 4 databases were explored by four authors: PubMed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and SciELO. The level of evidence and quality of the selected articles were assessed according to assessed according to the Quality Assessment Checklist of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Results 20 studies met the inclusion criteria: 2 metanalysis, 12 randomized clinical trial, 2 non-randomized clinical trial, 1 prospective cohort study, and 3 retrospective cohort study. It encompassed a total population of 8375 participants. Regarding the different surgical techniques, 18 studies (excluding metanalysis) performed coblation (n = 1550), 6 microdebridement (n = 883), 15 curettage (n = 4016), and 1 suction coagulation (n = 1926). Conclusion Coblator adenoidectomy appears to offer better adenoid control compared to curettage, with a possible, although not confirmed lower rate of revision surgery. Similarly, this greater resection of adenoid tissue seems to be related to a greater reduction of nasal obstruction. The advantages of this technique are mainly less surgical bleeding—although it is not clear this is a clinically relevant difference, and less postoperative pain compared to cold curettage. The difference in pain is small, as adenoidectomy is not a painful surgery in general. There is little evidence on the control of OME and comparison with other techniques such as microdebrider adenoidectomy.

Funder

Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine,Otorhinolaryngology

Reference43 articles.

1. Pereira L, Monyror J, Almeida FT, Almeida FR, Guerra E, Flores-Mir C et al (2018) Prevalence of adenoid hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev 38:101–112

2. Isaac A, Major M, Witmans M, Alrajhi Y, Flores-Mir C, Major P et al (2015) Correlations between acoustic rhinometry, subjective symptoms, and endoscopic findings in symptomatic children with nasal obstruction. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(6):550–555

3. Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, César JA, Chadha NK (2008) Intranasal corticosteroids for nasal airway obstruction in children with moderate to severe adenoidal hypertrophy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008(3):CD006286

4. McDermott KW, Liang L (2021) Overview of major ambulatory surgeries performed in hospital-owned facilities, 2019. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)

5. 2021 [cited 2023 Jun 18]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK577044/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3