Author:
Sutter Jan P.,Kocheise Lorenz,Kempski Jan,Christner Martin,Wichmann Dominic,Pinnschmidt Hans,Schmiedel Stefan,Lohse Ansgar W.,Huber Samuel,Brehm Thomas Theo
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Listeria monocytogenes causes severe bacterial infections with the highest mortality rate among foodborne pathogens in Europe. Combination treatment with ampicillin and gentamicin is recommended for invasive manifestations. However, evidence to support this treatment approach remains limited due to a lack of randomised controlled trials. To explore this critical issue further, we conducted this retrospective, single-center study.
Methods
We identified all patients hospitalized with invasive listeriosis at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf between 2009 and 2020 and analyzed the effect of gentamicin combination treatment versus monotherapy on 90-day mortality.
Results
In total, 36 patients with invasive listeriosis were included, of which 21 patients received gentamicin combination treatment and 15 received monotherapy. The mean age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aaCCI) value was lower in the gentamicin combination treatment group (5.4 vs. 7.4). Neurolisteriosis was more common in the gentamicin group (81% vs. 20%). The 90-day mortality was with significantly lower in the gentamicin combination treatment group (10%) compared to the monotherapy group (60%). Multivariable cox regression analysis, adjusted for a propensity score computed based on neurolisteriosis, aaCCI and sex, revealed a significantly reduced hazard ratio of 0.07 (95% CI: 0.01–0.53, p = 0.01) for 90-day mortality for the gentamicin combination treatment.
Conclusion
This retrospective study highlights the benefit of gentamicin combination treatment in reducing the 90-day mortality rate among patients with invasive listeriosis. The high prevalence of monotherapy in this study cohort raises concerns about the adequacy of antibiotic therapy in clinical practice.
Funder
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference11 articles.
1. de Noordhout CM, Devleesschauwer B, Angulo FJ, Verbeke G, Haagsma J, Kirk M et al. The global burden of listeriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis [Internet]. 2014;14:1073–82. http://www.thelancet.com/article/S1473309914708709/fulltext.
2. Charlier C, Perrodeau É, Leclercq A, Cazenave B, Pilmis B, Henry B et al. Clinical features and prognostic factors of listeriosis: the MONALISA national prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis [Internet]. 2017;17:510–9. http://www.thelancet.com/article/S1473309916305217/fulltext.
3. Scobie A, Kanagarajah S, Harris RJ, Byrne L, Amar C, Grant K, et al. Mortality risk factors for listeriosis - A 10 year review of non-pregnancy associated cases in England 2006–2015. J Infect. 2019;78:208–14.
4. Hof H. Listeriosis: therapeutic options. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;35:203–5.
5. Rivera-Izquierdo M, Galicia-García MD, Láinez-Ramos-Bossini AJ, Redruello-Guerrero P, Fernández-Martínez NF. Risk factors associated with early mortality after recovery from severe listeriosis: a multicentre 17-year longitudinal study. Infection. 2023;51:181–91.