Can a Good Theory Be Built Using Bad Ingredients?

Author:

Field Sarahanne M.,Volz Leonhard,Kaznatcheev Artem,van Dongen Noah

Abstract

AbstractThe replication crisis threatens to seriously impact theory development in the cognitive, behavioral, and social sciences. We canvas three desiderata of scientific theories (explanation, prediction, and unification) and argue that the extent to which failures of replication prove problematic depends on the primary purpose of a theory. If the aim is to explain how nature works, then accuracy—and thus replicability—of the findings on which the theory is built is essential. If the aim is to predict outcomes, then replicability of findings from which the predictive model or theory is built is only important as far as it affects the reliability and accuracy of the predictions. If the aim is to unify and organize disparate findings, then the replicability of findings plays a non-essential role. The result is that a multifaceted and nuanced perspective is required to assess the value of replicability and the need for replication studies. Specifying a theory’s purpose and background commitments should clarify the debate on replication and contribute to better theory development in the cognitive, behavioral, and social sciences.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference55 articles.

1. Bacon, F. (1878[1620]). Novum organum. Clarendon Press.

2. Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533(7604), 452–454.

3. Buzbas, E. O., Devezer, B., & Baumgaertner, B. (2023). The logical structure of experiments lays the foundation for a theory of reproducibility. Royal Society Open Science, 10(3), 221042.

4. Chakravartty, A. (2017). Scientific Realism. E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/scientific-realism/.

5. Cheng, M., Smith, D. S., Ren, X., Cao, H., Smith, S., & McFarland, D. A. (2023). How new ideas diffuse in science. American Sociological Review, 88(3), 522–561.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3