Abstract
AbstractGeographies of food are not only shaped by political economic forces but also by individuals who resist dominant ways of subjectivation. Based on ethnographic research on forty-seven agroecological farms in Switzerland and Morocco, this article proposes a philosophical reconsideration of the role of utopia, hope and enchantment in shaping people’s actions. It contributes to the understanding of the emotional, spiritual and embodied experiences that lead farmers to engage in alternative agricultures at the margins of state planning and agro-industry. The adoption of an etic research approach to ‘alternativity’ allows me to capture ‘quiet alternativities’, or farming experiences with beneficial socio-ecological outcomes but which are not represented as alternative or disruptive by the farmers themselves. This is especially important for Swiss and Moroccan farmers who do not always identify with a social movement or express any explicit opposition to agricultural policies and the dominant agri-food system, although their practices may effectively incorporate an alternative experience from where to envision different agri-cultures. Drawing from diverse conceptions of utopia, hope and enchantment, I unravel different manifestations of utopia as mental creations of ‘no-where’ and as embodied experiences of ‘no-when’. This enables me to attend to ‘quiet expressions’ of hope manifested not in speech but in daily practices and to discuss farmers’ motives to engage in alternative agricultures, despite a sometimes bleak outlook. I theorise these multiple experiences as ‘glimpses of utopias’ to explore the embodied and embedded dimensions of utopia to broaden what utopia can mean beyond purely speculative thinking.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. Ajl, M. 2021. Does the arab region have an agrarian question? The Journal of Peasant Studies 48(5): 955–983.
2. Akesbi, N. 2012. Une nouvelle stratégie pour l’agriculture marocaine: Le Plan Maroc Vert. New Médit 11(2): 12–23.
3. Althusser, L. 1968. For Marx. trans. Brewster, B. (1970), New York: Vintage.
4. Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 2000. What kind of economic theory for what kind of economic geography? Antipode 31(4): 4–9.
5. Barjolle, D. 2010. La Politique agricole Suisse entre économie, écologie et société. Économie Rurale 315: 1–8.