Author:
Evmenova Anya S.,Regan Kelley,Mergen Reagan,Hrisseh Roba
Abstract
AbstractGenerative AI has the potential to support teachers with writing instruction and feedback. The purpose of this study was to explore and compare feedback and data-based instructional suggestions from teachers and those generated by different AI tools. Essays from students with and without disabilities who struggled with writing and needed a technology-based writing intervention were analyzed. The essays were imported into two versions of ChatGPT using four different prompts, whereby eight sets of responses were generated. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore the data sets. Findings indicated: (a) differences in responses between ChatGPT versions and prompts, (b) AI feedback on student writing did not reflect provided student characteristics (e.g., grade level or needs; disability; ELL status), and (c) ChatGPT’s responses to the essays aligned with teachers’ identified areas of needs and instructional decisions to some degree. Suggestions for increasing educator engagement with AI to enhance teaching writing is discussed.
Funder
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford press.
2. Barbetta, P. M. (2023). Remedial and compensatory writing technologies for middle school students with learning disabilities and their classmates in inclusive classrooms. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2023.2259837
3. Boykin, A., Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., & Mastropieri, M. (2019). The impact of a computer-based graphic organizer with embedded self-regulated learning strategies on the argumentative writing of students in inclusive cross-curricula settings.
Computers & Education, 137, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.008
4. Billingsley, B., & Bettini, E. (2017). Improving special education teacher quality and effectiveness. In J. M. Kauffman, D. P. Hallahan, & P. C. Pullen (Eds.), Handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. 501-520). Boston: Taylor & Francis.
5. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klinger, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205