Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Global food production needs to increase to provide enough food for over 9 billion people living by 2050. Traditional animal production is among the leading causes for climate change and occupation of land. Edible insects might be a sustainable protein supply to humans, but environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) studies on them are scarce. This study performs an LCA of a small-scale production system of yellow mealworms (Tenebrio molitor) in Central Europe that are supplied with organic feedstuff.
Methods
A combined ReCiPe midpoint (H) and CED method is used to estimate the potential environmental impacts from cradle-to-gate. Impact categories include global warming potential (GWP), non-renewable energy use (NREU), agricultural land occupation (ALOP), terrestrial acidification potential (TAP) and freshwater eutrophication potential (FEP). The robustness of the results is tested via sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations.
Results and discussion
Impacts related to the production of 1 kg of edible mealworm protein amount to 20.4 kg CO2-eq (GWP), 213.66 MJ-eq (NREU), 22.38 m2 (ALOP), 159.52 g SO2-eq (TAP) and 12.41 g P-eq (FEP). Upstream feed production and on-farm energy demand related to the heating of the facilities are identified as environmental hot-spots: Depending on the impact category, feed supply contributes up to 90% and on-farm heating accounts for up to 65% of overall impacts. The organic mealworm production system is contrasted with a selected Austrian organic broiler production system, to which it compares favourably (18–72% lower impacts per category), with the exception of freshwater eutrophication (6% higher impacts).
Conclusions
This case study shows that the Austrian mealworm production system compares favourably to traditional livestock systems. Compared to LCAs from large-scale T. molitor rearing facilities in France and in the Netherlands, however, the Austrian production system cannot compete for the reasons of production scale, feed conversion efficiency and type of production system. Nevertheless, the investigated mealworms represent a sustainable protein alternative that should be added to the Western diet.
Funder
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Environmental Science
Reference70 articles.
1. Alig M, Grandl F, Mieleitner J et al (2012) Ökobilanz von Rind-, Schweine-und Geflügelfleisch. Forschungsanstalt Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon ART, Zürich
2. Barker Dayna, Fitzpatrick Marianne P., Dierenfeld Ellen S. (1998) Nutrient composition of selected whole invertebrates. Zoo Biol 17(2):123–134
3. Bellof G, Schmidt E (2007) Ökologische Geflügelmast-Lösungsmöglichkeiten für eine 100% Bio-Fütterung. In: Wiesinger K (ed) Angewandte Forschung und Beratung für den ökologischen Landbau in Bayern, Schriftenreihe der Bayerischen Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft (LfL), Freising. Freising, pp 23–33
4. BIO AUSTRIA (2015) Haltungsbestimmungen für Bio-Masthühner entsprechend der EU-Bio-Verordnung
5. Cesari V, Zucali M, Sandrucci A et al (2017) Environmental impact assessment of an Italian vertically integrated broiler system through a Life Cycle approach. J Clean Prod 143:904–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.030
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献