Differences in Contents and Formation Methods of Clinical Questions in Chinese and Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines of Acupuncture-Moxibustion: Scoping Review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Differences in Contents and Formation Methods of Clinical Questions in Chinese and Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines of Acupuncture-Moxibustion: Scoping Review

Published:2023-09-02 Issue:12 Volume:29 Page:1133-1141
ISSN:1672-0415
Container-title:Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:Chin. J. Integr. Med.

Author:

Zhao Nan-qi,Liu Ya-li,Ding Nan,Yuan Jing-yun,Mou Dong-xiao,Dong Guo-feng,Wang Xin,Wu Xiao-dong

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Complementary and alternative medicine,General Medicine

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11655-023-3641-0.pdf

Reference50 articles.

1. Jin YH, Han F, Wang Q, et al. Methodology for clinical practice guidelines — identifying and forming the scope, topic and clinical question. Chin Evid Base Cardiovasc Med (Chin) 2018;10:257–261.

2. Guo LH. Research on the influencing factors of implementability of clinical practice guidelines of acupuncture-moxibustion [Dissertation]. Beijing: China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 2020.

3. Liu BY. WHO Western Pacific Region. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of acupuncture-moxibustion. China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences. (Acessed 25 December 2008).

4. Ng JY, Kishimoto V. Multiple sclerosis clinical practice guidelines provide few complementary and alternative medicine recommendations: A systematic review. Complement Ther Med 2021;56:102595.

5. Wu XD, Yuan JY, Zhao NQ, et al. Investigation and analysis on the current situation of clinical practice guidelines for acupuncture-moxibustion at home and abroad. Chin Acupunct Moxibust (Chin) 2021;41:923–927, 932.