Author:
Scott Cinda P.,Mach Leon,Lucas Katherine M.,Myers Anna E.
Abstract
AbstractCultural Ecosystem Services (CES) are often contextualized as intrinsically derived or as providing important non-monetary benefits, which many argue are discounted, improperly categorized, disregarded, or inadequately converted into direct monetary values. Assessing and communicating CES benefits with nuance is even more difficult when considering different cultural values held within a community. Drawing on frameworks that center culture, equity, and power, we conducted a CES evaluation of mangrove ecosystems in Bocas del Toro (BDT), Panamá via semi-structured interviews with individuals from culturally diverse groups. Our study is one of the first to examine mangrove CES from the perspective of different stakeholder groups while also including dimensions of equity and power to better understand how they are understood and accessed differently by diverse users who interact with these ecosystems. Our results show that mental health benefits are multi-dimensional, experienced differently across stakeholder groups, and should be considered a dominant CES that deserves more dedicated attention. Findings also suggest that the loss of CES benefits in the context of ecosystem loss represents an important form of ecological grief. Finally, our findings support the ongoing calls for inclusion of local and Indigenous voices when designing, developing, and steering CES-based research to more adequately identify the needs of individual communities but also for our collective survival.
Funder
Ocean Nexus Center, EarthLab, University of Washington
The School for Field Studies
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference79 articles.
1. Acharya, G. (2016). Life at the margins: The social, economic and ecological importance of mangroves. Madera y Bosques, 8, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2002.801291
2. Agee, J. (2009). Developing qualitative research questions: A reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390902736512
3. Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Community, intimate government, and the making of environmental subjects in Kumaon. India. Current Anthropology, 46(2), 161–190. https://doi.org/10.1086/427122
4. Araújo, R. J. (2018). Mangrove forests of Bocas Del Toro province and the Ngöbe-Buglé Comarca, Panama: Structural description and comparison to neotropical forests. In D. O. Suman & A. K. Spalding (Eds.), Coastal resources of Bocas del Toro, Panama: Tourism and development pressures and the quest for sustainability (pp. 182–203). University of Miami.
5. Bang, K.-S., Lee, I., Kim, S., Lim, C. S., Joh, H. K., Park, B. J., et al. (2017). The effects of a campus forest-walking program on un-dergraduate and graduate students’ physical and psychological health. International Journal of Environmental Research andPublic Health, 14, 728.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献