Abstract
AbstractAcoustic models of railway vehicles in standstill and pass-by conditions can be used as part of a virtual certification process for new trains. For each piece of auxiliary equipment, the sound power measured on a test bench is combined with measured or predicted transfer functions. It is important, however, to allow for installation effects due to shielding by fairings or the train body. In the current work, fast-running analytical models are developed to determine these installation effects. The model for roof-mounted sources takes account of diffraction at the corner of the train body or fairing, using a barrier model. For equipment mounted under the train, the acoustic propagation from the sides of the source is based on free-field Green’s functions. The bottom surfaces are assumed to radiate initially into a cavity under the train, which is modelled with a simple diffuse field approach. The sound emitted from the gaps at the side of the cavity is then assumed to propagate to the receivers according to free-field Green’s functions. Results show good agreement with a 2.5D boundary element model and with measurements. Modelling uncertainty and parametric uncertainty are evaluated. The largest variability occurs due to the height and impedance of the ground, especially for a low receiver. This leads to standard deviations of up to 4 dB at low frequencies. For the roof-mounted sources, uncertainty over the location of the corner used in the equivalent barrier model can also lead to large standard deviations.
Funder
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Commission Regulation (EU) (2014) No 1304/2014 of 26 November 2014 on the technical specification for interoperability relating to the subsystem ‘rolling stock—noise’ amending Decision 2008/232/EC and repealing Decision 2011/229/EU. Official Journal of the European Union: 421–437
2. International Organization for Standardization (2013) Acoustics—railway applications—measurements of noise emitted by railbound vehicles, ISO 3095:2013, Geneva
3. Galijatovic E, Eichlseder M, Heindl SF et al (2022) Integrity of virtual testing for crash protection. Front Future Transp 3:914489
4. Huizinga FTMJM, Van Ostaijen RAA, Van Oosten SA (2002) A practical approach to virtual testing in automotive engineering. J Eng Des 13(1):33–47
5. Dressler K, Speckert M, Bitsch G (2009) Virtual durability test rigs for automotive engineering. Veh Syst Dyn 47(4):387–401