Abstract
AbstractWe evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftibuten-avibactam against Enterobacterales causing urinary tract infection (UTI). A total of 3216 isolates (1/patient) were consecutively collected from patients with UTI in 72 hospitals from 25 countries in 2021 then susceptibility tested by CLSI broth microdilution. Ceftibuten-susceptible breakpoints currently published by EUCAST (≤ 1 mg/L) and CLSI (≤ 8 mg/L) were applied to ceftibuten-avibactam for comparison. The most active agents were ceftibuten-avibactam (98.4%/99.6% inhibited at ≤ 1/ ≤ 8 mg/L), ceftazidime-avibactam (99.6% susceptible [S]), amikacin (99.1%S), and meropenem (98.2%S). Ceftibuten-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 mg/L) was fourfold more potent than ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC50/90, 0.12/0.25 mg/L) based on MIC50/90 values. The most active oral agents were ceftibuten (89.3%S; 79.5% inhibited at ≤ 1 mg/L), levofloxacin (75.4%S), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX; 73.4%S). Ceftibuten-avibactam inhibited 97.6% of isolates with an extended-spectrum β-lactamase phenotype, 92.1% of multidrug-resistant isolates, and 73.7% of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) at ≤ 1 mg/L. The second most active oral agent against CRE was TMP-SMX (24.6%S). Ceftazidime-avibactam was active against 77.2% of CRE isolates. In conclusion, ceftibuten-avibactam was highly active against a large collection of contemporary Enterobacterales isolated from patients with UTI and exhibited a similar spectrum to ceftazidime-avibactam. Ceftibuten-avibactam may represent a valuable option for oral treatment of UTI caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),General Medicine
Reference19 articles.
1. Simmering J, Tang F, Cavanaugh J, Polgreen L, Polgreen P (2017) The increase in hospitalizations for urinary tract infections and the associated costs in the United States, 1998–2011. Open Forum Infect Dis 4(1):ofw281. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofw281
2. Zilberberg MD, Shorr AF (2013) Secular trends in gram-negative resistance among urinary tract infection hospitalizations in the United States, 2000–2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34(9):940–946. https://doi.org/10.1086/671740
3. Sanchez GV, Babiker A, Master RN, Luu T, Mathur A, Bordon J (2016) Antibiotic resistance among urinary isolates from female outpatients in the United States in 2003 and 2012. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60(5):2680–2683. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02897-15
4. Kahlmeter G, Åhman J, Matuschek E (2015) Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli causing uncomplicated urinary tract infections: a European update for 2014 and comparison with 2000 and 2008. Infect. Dis. Ther. 4:417–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-015-0095-5
5. US FDA (2016) FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA advises restricting fluoroquinolone antibiotic use for certain uncomplicated infections; warns about disabling side effects that can occur together. July 26, 2016. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-fda-advises-restricting-fluoroquinolone-antibiotic-use-certain. Accessed July 2022
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献