Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Our study evaluated the diagnostic benefits of bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer patients with unilaterally positive prostate biopsy.
Methods
Our retrospective analysis included clinical, surgical, and histopathological data of 440 prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy and bilateral sentinel-guided and risk-adapted complementary extended pelvic lymphadenectomy at our hospital between 2015 and 2022. We performed multiparametric logistic regression analysis to identify the most relevant predictive factors for detecting lymph-node metastasis in this group of patients.
Results
Overall, 373 patients (85%) had histopathologically bilateral tumours and 45 (10%) pN1 status, of which 22 (49%) also had lymph-node metastasis contralateral to the side of the positive prostate biopsy. In two patients with confirmed unilateral disease in prostatectomy specimens, bilateral lymph-node metastases were observed. Eight pN1 patients would have been missed by unilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, resulting in a false-negative rate of 18%, 82% sensitivity, and 98% accuracy. Clinical tumour category, International Society of Urological Pathology grade, and percentage of prostate biopsy cores that are positive, as well as number of dissected lymph nodes contralateral to positive prostate biopsy, were determined as the most relevant predictive factors for detecting lymph-node metastasis. Our analysis was limited by its retrospective nature as well as by the fact that 80% of the patients did not receive MRI-targeted biopsy.
Conclusion
Our study highlights the diagnostic value of bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and the need for careful planning in surgery for prostate cancer patients with unilaterally positive prostate biopsy.
Funder
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Oncology,Hematology,General Medicine,Surgery
Reference30 articles.
1. Fossati N, Willemse P-PM, Van den Broeck T et al (2017) The benefits and harms of different extents of lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 72:84–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003
2. Hope TA, Eiber M, Armstrong WR et al (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for pelvic nodal metastasis detection prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a multicenter prospective phase 3 imaging trial. JAMA Oncol 7:1635–1642. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3771
3. Mottet N, Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, et al. (2021) EAU - EANM - ESTRO - ESUR - ISUP - SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2021. Arnhem, The Netherlands: EAU Guidelines Office. Accessed 2022–11–29. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer
4. Cacciamani GE, Maas M, Nassiri N et al (2021) Impact of pelvic lymph node dissection and its extent on perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 4:134–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.001
5. Briganti A, Larcher A, Abdollah F et al (2012) Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol 61:480–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.044