Can the intra-operative measurement of the diameter of the femoral head help surgeons to choose the best size of the acetabular cup?

Author:

Muñoz-Mahamud ErnestoORCID,Chimeno Clara,Tornero Eduard,Alías Alfonso,Fernández-Valencia Jenaro Ángel,Combalia AndrésORCID

Abstract

Abstract Purpose We hypothesized that the intra-operative measurement of the femoral head may increase the accuracy of the acetabular cup size optimal selection in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this clinical research was to analyze the correlation between the estimated cup size from intra-operative measurement of the femoral head and the pre-operative templated cup size. Methods A prospective observational single-center study was conducted from June 2019 to January 2020 including primary THA (n = 100). All cases were pre-operatively templated. The measurement of the anterior–posterior diameter of the femoral head was routinely intra-operatively performed. Any definitive implanted cup was considered as “oversized” when the size was > 4 mm than the diameter of the native head. Results The median (interquartile range) size of the implanted cup, pre-operative planned cup size, and diameter of the femoral head were measured 52 (50–54) mm, 50 (48–54) mm and 49 (45–51) mm, respectively. Pre-operative planned size cup accurately predicted the implanted cup or differed in only one size (2 mm) in 77 (78%) cases. Otherwise, intra-operative femoral head measurement method accurately predicted the implanted or differed in only one size (2 mm) in 51 (87%) cases (p = 0.097). Conclusion The intra-operative femoral head measurement is a simple and reliable tool to help the surgeons choose the best size of the acetabular cup and is as reliable as the pre-operative templating in order to avoid cup oversizing in THA. Utmost caution is warranted whenever the cup reamer is > 4 mm than the anterior–posterior diameter of the native head.

Funder

Universitat de Barcelona

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Reference15 articles.

1. Bourne RB, Maloney WJ, Wright JG (2004) An AOA critical issue. The outcome of the outcomes movement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:633–640

2. Chang RW, Pellisier JM, Hazen GB (1996) A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. JAMA 275:858–865

3. Eggli S, Pisan M, Muller ME (1998) The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 80(3):382

4. Garvin K (2005) Primary total hip arthroplasty: preoperative planning and templating. In: Lieberman J, Berry D (eds) Advanced reconstruction hip. Rosemont (III), edited by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, p 41

5. Gallart X, Daccach JJ, Fernández-Valencia JÁ, García S, Bori G, Rios J, Riba J (2012) Study of the consistency of a system for preoperative planning digital in total arthroplasty of the hip. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 56(6):471–477

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3