Clinical outcome and survival rate of condylar constrained knee prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty: an average nine point six year follow-up-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clinical outcome and survival rate of condylar constrained knee prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty: an average nine point six year follow-up

Published:2024-02-14 Issue:5 Volume:48 Page:1179-1187
ISSN:0341-2695
Container-title:International Orthopaedics
language:en
Short-container-title:International Orthopaedics (SICOT)

Author:

Yu Muyang,Xu Yiming,Weng Xisheng,Feng Bin^ORCID

Funder

Beijing Natural Science Foundation

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences

the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00264-024-06096-6.pdf

Reference46 articles.

1. Castagnini F, Sudanese A, Bordini B, Tassinari E, Stea S, Toni A (2017) Total knee replacement in young patients: survival and causes of revision in a registry population. J Arthroplasty 32:3368–3372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.052

2. Long H, Xie D, Zeng C, Wang H, Lei G, Yang T (2023) Burden and characteristics of revision total knee arthroplasty in China: a national study based on hospitalized cases. J Arthroplasty 38:1320-1325.e1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.02.052

3. Moussa ME, Lee YY, Patel AR, Westrich GH (2017) Clinical outcomes following the use of constrained condylar knees in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:1869–1873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.001

4. Pitta M, Esposito CI, Li Z, Lee YY, Wright TM, Padgett DE (2018) Failure after modern total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study of 18,065 knees. J Arthroplasty 33:407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.041

5. Mancuso F, Beltrame A, Colombo E, Miani E, Bassini F (2017) Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomed 88:98–111. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6520