Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a significant clinical problem and can occur even with optimal implant alignment. We hypothesized that different patterns of pelvic flexion/extension (PFE) during daily activities may influence acetabular alignment and contribute to impingement and instability following THA. Recently, there has been an increased interest in spinopelvic alignment and its impact on THA. Therefore, this study aimed to identify different patterns of PFE that could be predictive of instability following THA.
Methods
A range of motion (ROM) simulator was used to demonstrate the effects of different patterns of PFE on ROM and impingement. The findings were applied to PFE measurements obtained from 84 patients in standing and sitting positions.
Results
Three different categories of PFE were identified: normal, hypermobile, and stiff. ROM simulator revealed that changes in PFE had affected ROM and impingement significantly. Patients in the stiff pelvis category, even with “optimal” implant alignment, were more susceptible to implant impingement.
Conclusions
The different patterns of PFE during daily activities could affect acetabular alignment and stability following THA. We propose a classification system that can identify different types of PFE and predict their effects on the stability of prostheses following THA. Hence, we believe that patients with unfavorable PFE may require modified cup alignment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference39 articles.
1. Khan M, Della Valle CJ, Jacofsky DJ, Meneghini RM, Haddad FS (2015) Early postoperative complications after total hip arthroplasty: current strategies for prevention and treatment. Instr Course Lect 64:337–346
2. Dargel J, Oppermann J, Bruggemann GP, Eysel P (2014) Dislocation following total hip replacement. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111:884–890. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0884
3. Gwam CU, Mistry JB, Mohamed NS, Thomas M, Bigart KC, Mont MA, Delanois RE (2017) Current epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States: national inpatient sample 2009 to 2013. J Arthroplasty 32:2088–2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.046
4. Homesley HD, Minnich JM, Parvizi J, Hozack WJ (2004) Total hip arthroplasty revision: a decade of change. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 33:389–392
5. Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J (2012) The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 83:442–448. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.733919