Healthy human skin Kelvin-Voigt fractional and spring-pot biomarkers reconstruction using torsional wave elastography

Abstract

AbstractThis paper presents a novel method for reconstructing skin parameters using Probabilistic Inverse Problem (PIP) techniques and Torsional Wave Elastography (TWE) rheological modeling. A comprehensive examination was conducted to compare and analyze the theoretical, time-of-flight (TOF), and full-signal waveform (FSW) approaches. The objective was the identification of the most effective method for the estimation of mechanical parameters. Initially, the most appropriate rheological model for the simulation of skin tissue behavior was determined through the application and comparison of two models, spring pot (SP) and Kevin Voigt fractional derivative (KVFD). A numerical model was developed using the chosen rheological models. The collection of experimental data from 15 volunteers utilizing a TWE sensor was crucial for obtaining significant information for the reconstruction process. The study sample consisted of five male and ten female subjects ranging in age from 25 to 60 years. The procedure was performed on the ventral forearm region of the participants. The process of reconstructing skin tissue parameters was carried out using PIP techniques. The experimental findings were compared with the numerical results. The three methods considered (theoretical, TOF, FSW) have been used. The efficacy of TOF and FSW was then compared with theoretical method. The findings of the study demonstrate that the FSW and TOF techniques successfully reconstructed the parameters of the skin tissue in all of the models. The SP model’s the skin tissue $$\eta $$ η values ranged from 8 to 12 $$Pa \cdot s$$ P a · s , as indicated by the TOF reconstruction parameters. $$\eta $$ η values found by the KVFD model ranged from 4.1 to 9.3 $$Pa \cdot s$$ P a · s . The $$\mu $$ μ values generated by the KVFD model range between 0.61 and 96.86 kPa. However, FSW parameters reveal that skin tissue $$\eta $$ η values for the SP model ranged from 7.8 to 12 $$Pa \cdot s$$ P a · s . The KVFD model determined $$\eta $$ η values between 6.3 and 9.5 $$Pa \cdot s$$ P a · s . The KVFD model presents $$\mu $$ μ values ranging between 26.02 and 122.19 kPa. It is shown that the rheological model that best describes the nature of the skin is the SP model and its simplicity as it requires only two parameters, in contrast to the three parameters required by the KVFD model. Therefore, this work provides a valuable addition to the area of dermatology, with possible implications for clinical practice.