Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This study was conducted to explore the preference and experience of paediatric dentists based in Switzerland regarding the use of articaine and other local and topical anaesthesia.
Methods
An 18-question survey was developed, piloted, and distributed to the members of the Swiss association of paediatric dentistry (n = 460). The following information were collected: most used local anaesthetic in different age groups, time needed to inject a full ampule, frequency of observed local and systemic side effects, application of topical anaesthetic prior to injection, time waited between application and the injection, and perceived effectiveness of topical anaesthetic. The dentists’ responses were analysed with logistic regressions reporting odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) at 5%.
Results
The response rate was 37% (n = 168) out of the 460 questionnaires sent, with the responders being predominantly female (67%) and 47-year-old on average. More than 80% of the dentists used articaine in all age groups. 45% of responders took longer than 60 s to inject a full ampule. Local and systemic side-effects were observed by 82% and 28% of respondents respectively, although the nature and the significance of those were not detailed due to the anonymous nature of the questionnaire. Significantly less local adverse effects were seen for older children (p = 0.04) and among dentists with more years of experience (p = 0.01). Most responders applied topical anaesthetic and half of them waited longer than 60 s before injection.
Conclusions
Articaine is a widely used local anaesthetic by the studied group of Swiss paediatric dentists regardless of patient’s age. The use of topical anaesthetic before injection is a common practice with good perceived effectiveness.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Dentistry (miscellaneous),Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference26 articles.
1. Alanazi FS, Alhazzaa MF, Alosaimi YM, Alajaji FA, Alanazi AS, Alassaf A, Almulhim B, Alghamdi SA, Mallineni SK. Preference of dental practitioners toward the use of local and topical anesthetics for pediatric patients in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional survey. Children. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110978.
2. Arzneimittel-Kompendium der Schweiz, https://compendium.ch/product/123475-rudocain-forte-inj-los/mpro#MPro7200. Accessed 01 May 2023.
3. Becker DE, Reed KL. Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology. Anesth Prog. 2006;53(3):98–108. https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-59.2.90.
4. Brandt RG, Anderson PF, McDonald NJ, Sohn W, Peters MC. The pulpal anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in dentistry: a meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142(5):493–504. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0219.
5. Brickhouse TH, Unkel JH, Webb MD, Best AM, Hollowell RL. Articaine use in children among dental practitioners. Pediatr Dent. 2008;30(6):516–21.