Abstract
AbstractAcademics in higher education around the world indicate high levels of stress from multiple sources. The COVID-19 pandemic has only served to intensify stress levels. Adaptation and resilience are needed if academics, particularly those focused on education and teaching, are to endure, learn, andbounce backduring this era of stress and contribute to education quality and student learning. This review is organized to answer two key questions. First, what are the main forms of stress for academics, especially those focused on education and teaching? Second, what are the responses of academics to stress and is the concept of resilience relevant to understand the consequences for academic careers oriented toward education and education quality? To answer these questions, we first critically review the literature on the responses of academics to stress and the concept of resilience, which has been employed by multiple disciplines, including teacher education. We then broadly define the resilience of academics as their capacity to learn from and adapt to stress; our definition is perhaps less about individual personality characteristics and more associated with the relational aspect of the socioecological higher education ecosystem. There are, however, limits to resilience and its potential effects on education quality and student learning. Given higher education’s adverse operating environment and the significant contributions of academics to the knowledge economy and graduate quality, understanding and building the resilience of academics to adapt and succeed has never been more critical.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference165 articles.
1. Ainsworth, S., & Oldfield, J. (2019). Quantifying teacher reslience: Context matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.012
2. Arthur, L. (2009). From performativity to professionalism: Lecturers’ responses to student feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903050228
3. Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA: A scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8
4. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Open University Press.
5. Bell, S. (2009). Women in science: Maximising productivity, diversity and innovation. Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies (FASTS).
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献