What-if history of science-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

What-if history of science

Published:2014-12-06 Issue:1 Volume:24 Page:5-24
ISSN:0815-0796
Container-title:Metascience
language:en
Short-container-title:Metascience

Author:

Love Alan C.,Richards Robert J.,Bowler Peter J.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,General Social Sciences,History

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11016-014-9921-8.pdf

Reference34 articles.

1. Amundson, R. 2005. The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: Roots of evo-devo. New York: Cambridge University Press.

2. Beatty, J. 2006. Replaying life’s tape. Journal of Philosophy 103: 336–362.

3. Bellon, R. 2011. Inspiration in the harness of daily labor: Darwin, botany, and the triumph of evolution, 1859–1868. Isis 102: 393–420.

4. Bowler, P.J. 1976. Fossils and progress: Paleontology and the idea of progressive evolution in the nineteenth century. New York: Science History Publications.

5. Bowler, P.J. 1983. The eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian evolution theories in the decades around 1900. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An unappreciated merit of counterfactual histories of science;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences;2020-06

2. Motives and merits of counterfactual histories of science;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences;2019-02

3. So close no matter how far: counterfactuals in history of science and the inevitability/contingency controversy;Synthese;2018-04-19

4. Counterfactuals, causes and contingency in the history of science;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences;2016-12

5. Presidential address: Experimenting with the scientific past;The British Journal for the History of Science;2016-06