Cost‐Efficacy Analysis of Use of Frozen Section Histology for Margin Assessment During Breast Conservation Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients

Author:

Agarwal Gaurav1ORCID,Sattavan Swati1ORCID,Vishvak Chanthar K. M. M.1,Kumar Anup2,Sabaretnam M.1,Chand Gyan1,Mishra Anjali1,Agrawal Vinita3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS) Raebareli Road 226014 Lucknow Uttar Pradesh India

2. Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India

3. Department of Pathology Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow India

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMargin assessment is an essential component of breast conservation surgery (BCS). Re‐excision of infiltrated margin(s) detected on paraffin section histology (PSH) needs reoperation, adding time, inconvenience and cost. Intra‐operative assessment of margins using frozen section histology (IFSH) can potentially obviate need for re‐operation, thus facilitating one‐step oncologically complete BCS.MethodsIFSH and PSH reports of consecutive patients undergoing BCS (2010–2020) were reviewed. Accuracy and cost‐efficacy of IFSH were assessed, considering PSH as gold standard. Cost of achieving oncologically complete BCS in whole cohort with IFSH (Scenario‐A) was calculated and compared using appropriate statistical tests, with hospital costs for the cohort in a hypothetical Scenario‐B, where IFSH was presumed not to have been used and all patients with infiltrated margin(s) on PSH would have been re‐operated.ResultsOf the 367 patients screened, 39 were excluded due to incomplete IFSH data. Of 328 patients analyzed, 59 (18%) had one or more margins were reported infiltrated on IFSH, managed by re‐excision or mastectomy in the same sitting, thus avoiding a reoperation. Additional 8 (2.4%) had involved margins on PSH (False negative IFSH). Significantly higher number of reoperations (p < 0.001) would have been needed in scenario‐B. Average cost of the first operation with use of IFSH was Indian Rupees (INR) 25791 which included INR660 as IFSH cost. The average cost of reoperation was INR23724 which could be avoided in 59 (18%) by use of IFSH. The average cost per patient to achieve oncologically complete surgery in scenario A utilizing IFSH was significantly lower (p = 0.001) by INR3101 (11.7%), c.w. that in scenario B. Significant cost‐saving with IFSH was maintained in cost‐efficacy analysis undertaken with various higher and lower costs assumptions.ConclusionsUse of IFSH facilitates one‐step oncologically complete BCS in majority of patients and results in considerable cost saving, resulting in avoidance of reoperations, besides preventing patient anxiety and delay in adjuvant treatment.Trial RegistrationClinical Trials Registry—India (CTRI/2021/08/035896).

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3