Abstract
AbstractDiagnosis of symptomatic valve malfunction in hydrocephalic patients treated with VP-Shunt (VPS) might be difficult. Clinical symptoms such as headache or nausea are nonspecific, hence cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) over- or underdrainage can only be suspected but not proven. Knowledge concerning valve malfunction is still limited. We aim to provide data on the flow characteristics of explanted shunt valves in patients with suspected valve malfunction. An in vitro shunt laboratory setup was used to analyze the explanted valves under conditions similar to those in an implanted VPS. The differential pressure (DP) of the valve was adjusted stepwise to 20, 10, 6, and 4 cmH2O. The flow rate of the explanted and the regular flow rate of an identical reference valve were evaluated at the respective DPs. Twelve valves of different types (Codman CertasPlus valve n = 3, Miethke Shuntassistant valve n = 4, Codman Hakim programmable valve n = 3, DP component of Miethke proGAV 2.0 valve n = 2) from eight hydrocephalic patients (four male), in whom valve malfunction was assumed between 2016 and 2017, were replaced with a new valve. Four patients suffered from idiopathic normal pressure (iNPH), three patients from malresorptive and one patient from obstructive hydrocephalus. Post-hoc analysis revealed a significant difference (p < 0.001) of the flow rate between each explanted valve and their corresponding reference valve, at each DP. In all patients, significant alterations of flow rates were demonstrated, verifying a valve malfunction, which could not be objectified by the diagnostic tools used in the clinical routine. In cases with obscure clinical VPS insufficiency, valve deficiency should be considered.
Funder
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neurology (clinical),General Medicine,Surgery
Reference41 articles.
1. Aschoff A (1994) In-vitro-Testung von Hydrocephalus-Ventilen. Verlag nicht ermittelbar,
2. Aschoff A, Benesch C, Kremer P, von Haken MS, Klank A, Osterloh M, Fruh K. The Solved and Unsolved Problems of Hydrocephalus Valves: A Critical Comment. In: Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993. Intracerebral Hemorrhage Hydrocephalus malresorptivus Peripheral Nerves. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 103-114
3. Aschoff A, Krämer P, Benesch C, Klank A (1991) Shunt-technology and overdrainage–a critical review of hydrostatic, programmable and variable-resistance-valves and flow-reducing devices. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1(Suppl 1):49–50
4. Aschoff A OM, Benesch C, Haken M, Krämer P, Kunze S (1990) Criteria and methods for testing hydrocephalus valves and anti-siphon devices. Results of 102 tested exemplars. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Hellenic Neurosurgical Society and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie, 1990
5. Benveniste RJ, Sur S (2018) Delayed symptom progression after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement for normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci 393:105–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2018.08.002