A marginal modelling approach for predicting wildfire extremes across the contiguous United States
Author:
D’Arcy Eleanor, Murphy-Barltrop Callum J. R.ORCID, Shooter Rob, Simpson Emma S.
Abstract
AbstractThis paper details a methodology proposed for the EVA 2021 conference data challenge. The aim of this challenge was to predict the number and size of wildfires over the contiguous US between 1993 and 2015, with more importance placed on extreme events. In the data set provided, over 14% of both wildfire count and burnt area observations are missing; the objective of the data challenge was to estimate a range of marginal probabilities from the distribution functions of these missing observations. To enable this prediction, we make the assumption that the marginal distribution of a missing observation can be informed using non-missing data from neighbouring locations. In our method, we select spatial neighbourhoods for each missing observation and fit marginal models to non-missing observations in these regions. For the wildfire counts, we assume the compiled data sets follow a zero-inflated negative binomial distribution, while for burnt area values, we model the bulk and tail of each compiled data set using non-parametric and parametric techniques, respectively. Cross validation is used to select tuning parameters, and the resulting predictions are shown to significantly outperform the benchmark method proposed in the challenge outline. We conclude with a discussion of our modelling framework, and evaluate ways in which it could be extended.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Global Collaborative Research, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Engineering (miscellaneous),Statistics and Probability
Reference39 articles.
1. Wong, S.D., Broader, J.C., Shaheen, S.A.: Review of California wildfire evacuations from 2017 to 2019. University of California Institute of Transportation Studies, Technical report, UC Office of the President (2020) 2. Jones, M.W., Smith, A., Betts, R., Canadell, J.G., Prentice, I.C., Le Quéré, C.: Climate change increases risk of wildfires. ScienceBrief Review (2020) 3. Zhuang, Y., Fu, R., Santer, B.D., Dickinson, R.E., Hall, A.: Quantifying contributions of natural variability and anthropogenic forcings on increased fire weather risk over the western United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118(45), 2111875118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111875118 4. Opitz, T.: Editorial: EVA 2021 Data Competition on spatio-temporal prediction of wildfire activity in the United States. Extremes (to appear) (2022) 5. Coles, S.G., Heffernan, J.E., Tawn, J.A.: Dependence measures for extreme value analyses. Extremes 2(4), 339–365 (1999)
|
|