To wear or not to wear? Unpacking the #NoMask discourses and conversations on Twitter

Author:

Lavorgna AnitaORCID,Carr Les,Kingdon Ashton

Abstract

AbstractIn the context of the COVID-19 health crisis, the use of face masks has been a topic broadly debated. In many Western countries, especially at the heights of the pandemic, discussions on the use of protective facemasks were often linked to what were mainly political considerations, often fueled by health-related misinformation. Our study brings together social sciences and computer science expertise to retrospectively unpack the #NoMask discourses and conversations using both network analysis approaches on big data retrieved from Twitter and qualitative analyses on sub-sets of relevant social media data. By looking comparatively at two dataset gathered at different stages of the health crisis (2020 and 2022), we aim to better understand the role of Twitter in that interesting area where the dissemination of health misinformation became capitalized by the political narrative linking the social discontent caused by the socio-economic impacts of the pandemic to specific political ideologies. Our analyses show that there has never been a unique ‘NoMask movement,’ nor a defined online community. Rather, we can identify a range of relatively niche, loosely connected, and heterogeneous actors that, in the course of the pandemic, independently pushed diverse (but converging and compatible) discourses. Conversations directly linked to the #NoMask relevant hashtags are overall limited, as twitters using them are not talking to each other; nonetheless, they successfully engaged a larger audience.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference96 articles.

1. Amarasingam A, Argentino MA (2020) The QAnon conspiracy theory: a security threat in the making? CTC Sentinel 13(7):37–44

2. Argentino MA (2020) QAnon Conspiracy Theories about the Coronavirus Pandemic are a Public Health Threat. Available at: https://theconversation.com/qanon-conspiracy-theories-about-the-coronavirus-pandemic-are-a-public-health-threat-135515.

3. Barbieri PN (2021) Bonini B (2021) Political orientation and adherence to social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Economia Politica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-021-00224-w

4. BBC (2020) Coronavirus: ‘Deadly masks’ Claims Debunked. Available from: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/53108405.

5. Blank G (2017) The digital divide among twitter users and its implications for social research. Soc Sci Comput Rev 35(6):679–697

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3