Abstract
AbstractThe deep operator network (DeepONet) structure has shown great potential in approximating complex solution operators with low generalization errors. Recently, a sequential DeepONet (S-DeepONet) was proposed to use sequential learning models in the branch of DeepONet to predict final solutions given time-dependent inputs. In the current work, the S-DeepONet architecture is extended by modifying the information combination mechanism between the branch and trunk networks to simultaneously predict vector solutions with multiple components at multiple time steps of the evolution history, which is the first in the literature using DeepONets. Two example problems, one on transient fluid flow and the other on path-dependent plastic loading, were shown to demonstrate the capabilities of the model to handle different physics problems. The use of a trained S-DeepONet model in inverse parameter identification via the genetic algorithm is shown to demonstrate the application of the model. In almost all cases, the trained model achieved an $$R^2$$
R
2
value of above 0.99 and a relative $$L_2$$
L
2
error of less than 10% with only 3200 training data points, indicating superior accuracy. The vector S-DeepONet model, having only 0.4% more parameters than a scalar model, can predict two output components simultaneously at an accuracy similar to the two independently trained scalar models with a 20.8% faster training time. The S-DeepONet inference is at least three orders of magnitude faster than direct numerical simulations, and inverse parameter identifications using the trained model are highly efficient and accurate.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Bastek, J.H., Kochmann, D.M.: Inverse-design of nonlinear mechanical metamaterials via video denoising diffusion models (2023) arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19836
2. Sosnovik, I., Oseledets, I.: Neural networks for topology optimization. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Model. 34(4), 215–223 (2019)
3. Lira, J.O.B., Riella, H.G., Padoin, N., Soares, C.: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD), artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA) as a hybrid method for the analysis and optimization of micro-photocatalytic reactors: Nox abatement as a case study. Chem. Eng. J. 431, 133771 (2022)
4. Belbute-Peres, F.D.A., Economon, T., Kolter, Z.: Combining differentiable PDE solvers and graph neural networks for fluid flow prediction. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2402–2411. PMLR (2020)
5. Ye, X., Li, H., Huang, J., Qin, G.: On the locality of local neural operator in learning fluid dynamics (2023). arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09820
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献