The Role of Formal Policy to Promote Informed Consent of Psychotropic Medications for Youth in Child Welfare Custody: A National Examination

Author:

Mackie Thomas I.ORCID,Schaefer Ana J.ORCID,Palatucci John S.ORCID,Leslie Laurel K.ORCID,Crystal Stephen,Gusmano Michael,Karpman Hannah E.

Abstract

AbstractActive participation of youth and surrogate decision-makers in providing informed consent and assent for mental health treatment is critical. However, the procedural elements of an informed consent process, particularly for youth in child welfare custody, are not well defined. Given calls for psychotropic medication oversight for youth in child welfare custody, this study proposes a taxonomy for the procedural elements of informed consent policies based upon formal and informal child welfare policies and then examines whether enacted state formal policies across the United States endorsed these elements. A sequential multi-method study design included: (1) semi-structured interviews with key informants (n = 58) primarily from state child welfare agencies to identify a taxonomy of procedural elements for informed consent of psychotropic medications and then (2) a legislative review of the 50 states and D.C. to characterize whether formal policies endorsed each procedural element through February 2022. Key informants reported five procedural elements in policy, including how to: (1) gather social and medical history, (2) prescribe the medication, (3) authorize its use through consent and youth assent, (4) notify relevant stakeholders, and (5) routinely review the consenting decision. Twenty-three states endorsed relevant legislation; however, only two states specified all five procedural elements. Additionally, the content of a procedural element, when included, varied substantively across policies. Further research and expert consensus are needed to set best practices and guide policymakers in setting policies to advance transparency and accountability for informed consent of mental health treatment among youth in child welfare custody.

Funder

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

William T. Grant Foundation

National Center for Advancing Clinical and Translational Science at the National Institute of Health

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pshychiatric Mental Health

Reference37 articles.

1. American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. (2012). A guide for community child serving agencies on psychotropic medications for children and adolescents. Retrieved from https://www.aacap.org/App_Themes/AACAP/docs/press/guide_for_community_child_serving_agencies_on_psychotropic_medications_for_children_and_adolescents_2012.pdf.

2. American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. (2015). Recommendations about the use of psychotropic medications for children and adolescents involved in ChildServing systems. Retrieved from https://www.aacap.org/App_Themes/AACAP/docs/clinical_practice_center/systems_of_care/AACAP_Psychotropic_Medication_Recommendations_2015_FINAL.pdf.

3. Barnett, E. R., Boucher, E. A., Neubacher, K., & Carpenter-Song, E. A. (2016a). Decision-making around psychotropic medications for children in foster care: Perspectives from foster parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 206–213.

4. Barnett, E. R., Butcher, R. L., Neubacher, K., Jankowski, M. K., Daviss, W. B., Carluzzo, K. L., Ungarelli, E. G., & Yackley, C. R. (2016b). Psychotropic medications in child welfare: From federal mandate to direct care. Children and Youth Services Review, 66, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.04.015

5. Barnett, E. R., Concepcion-Zayas, M. T., Zisman-Ilani, Y., & Bellonci, C. (2019). Patient-centered psychiatric care for youth in foster care: A systematic and critical review. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 13(4), 462–489.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3