Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pharmacists have been co-located in general practice teams to support the quality use of medicines and optimise patient health outcomes. Evidence of the impact of pharmacist-led activities in Australian general practices is sparse.
Aim
This study aimed to evaluate the potential outcomes of pharmacist-led activities in Australian general practices.
Method
A prospective observational study was conducted in eight general practices in the Australian Capital Territory, where each general practice employed a pharmacist on a part-time basis for 18 months. A recommended, but flexible, list of activities was provided for pharmacists. Descriptive information on general practice pharmacist-led activities, collected with an online diary, was analysed. The potential clinical, economic, and organisational impact of pharmacist-led clinical activities was evaluated using the CLinical Economic Organisational (CLEO) tool, with a modified economic dimension.
Results
Nine pharmacists reported 4290 activities over 3918.5 work hours in general practice. Medication management services were the primary clinical activity of pharmacists. In medication reviews, 75% of the pharmacists’ recommendations were fully accepted by general practitioners. Conducting clinical audits, updating patients’ medical records, and providing information to patients and staff were other major activities of pharmacists. Of 2419 clinical activities, around 50% had the potential for a moderate or major positive clinical impact on patients. Sixty-three per cent of activities had the potential to decrease healthcare costs. Almost all the pharmacist-led clinical activities had a positive organisational impact.
Conclusion
Most pharmacist-led clinical activities in general practice had the potential for a positive impact on patients and reduction in healthcare costs, supporting the expansion of this model in Australia.
Funder
Capital Health Network (CHN): Australian Capital Territory’s primary health network
Accelerating Higher Education Expansion and Development (AHEAD) scholarship
University of Canberra
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology,Toxicology,Pharmacy
Reference41 articles.
1. Swerissen H, Duckett S, Moran G. Mapping primary care in Australia. In: Grattan institute report no. 2018-09. Grattan institute, Melbourne, Australia. 2018. https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/906-Mapping-primary-care.pdf. Accessed 14 Jun 2019.
2. Riley R, Spiers J, Buszewicz M, et al. What are the sources of stress and distress for general practitioners working in England? A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e017361.
3. Sturmberg JP, O’Halloran DM, McDonnell G, et al. General practice work and workforce: Interdependencies between demand, supply and quality. Aust J Gen Pract. 2018;47(8):507–13.
4. Liu JX, Goryakin Y, Maeda A, et al. Global health workforce labor market projections for 2030. Hum Resour Health. 2017;15(1):18.
5. Koopmans L, Damen N, Wagner C. Does diverse staff and skill mix of teams impact quality of care in long-term elderly health care? An exploratory case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):988.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献