Probabilities in the Courtroom: An Evaluation of the Objections and Policies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Probabilities in the Courtroom: An Evaluation of the Objections and Policies

Published:1992 Issue: Volume: Page:167-184
ISSN:
Container-title:Handbook of Psychology and Law
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Koehler Jonathan J.

Publisher

Springer New York

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-1-4757-4038-7_9

Reference75 articles.

1. Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). The base rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologies 44, 211–233.

2. Bar-Hillel, M. (1983). The base rate fallacy controversy. In R.W. Scholz (Ed.), Decision making under uncertainty (pp. 39–61). North Holland: Elsevier Science.

3. Bar-Hillel, M. (1984). Probabilistic analysis in legal factfinding. Acta Psychologica, 56, 267–284.

4. Bergman, P. & Moore, A. Maintaining weight loss: Bayesian analysis meets the F-word. Paper presented at the Decision and Inference in Litigation conference, Cardozo School of Law, New York (March, 1991)

5. Brilmayer, L. (1986). Second-order evidence and Bayesian logic. Boston Universtiy Law Review, 66, 673–691.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. References;Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists 3e;2020-12-04

2. People Make the Same Bayesian Judgment They Criticize in Others;Psychological Science;2018-11-12

3. Statistically inaccurate and morally unfair judgements via base rate intrusion;Nature Human Behaviour;2017-10

4. The base rate principle and the fairness principle in social judgment;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;2016-06-20

5. Surrogate Science;Journal of Management;2014-09-02