Abstract
AbstractThis contribution reflects on the role of soft law instruments to address the rule of law crisis, a topic of high relevance in the context of this special issue. Indeed, the EU-15 enlargement towards the ‘periphery’ proceeded also through soft law instruments, perceived to allow greater flexibility in monitoring. Soft law – or rules of conduct that have no legally binding force but may have legal and practical effects (Snyder 1993, 64) have been considered inappropriate by the literature in dealing with the regulation of values in EU law. However, a closer look at the career of soft law issued for Romania under the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism appears to suggest a more nuanced picture. Whilst time is not yet ripe for a full assessment of the effectiveness of the tools, there are signs that show that the reports issued by the Commission within the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism process have had an influence in fostering change. They did so by catalysing litigation and, as a result, informing and fuelling an institutional dialogue on the rule of law at the transnational level.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Avbelj M, Vatovec K (2021) The Uneasy Reception of EU Soft Law in the Slovenian Legal Order. Eliantonio M, Korkea-aho E, Ștefan O EU Soft law in the Member States: Theoretical Findings and Empirical Evidence. Hart, Oxford, pp 221–235
2. Bercea R, Doroga S (2022) The Romanian Report. in Aspei et al (eds) TRIIAL national reports Belgium, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, e Netherlands, EUI RSC, 2022/52, Centre for Judicial Cooperation available at https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/74814/RSC_2022_52.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
3. Beveridge F, Nott S (1998) A Hard Look at Soft Law. in Craig P, Harlow C Lawmaking in the European Union. Kluwer, London, pp 285–305
4. Călin D (2022) Case C-817/21, Inspecția Judiciară. Compatibility of the organization of an authority competent to carry out the disciplinary investigation of judges, which is under the total control of a single person, with the rules of the rule of law available at. https://officialblogofunio.com/2022/01/18/case-c-817-21-inspectia-judiciara-compatibility-of-the-organization-of-an-authority-competent-to-carry-out-the-disciplinary-investigation-of-judges-which-is-under-the-total-control-of-a-single-pers/
5. Cameron I (2021) The role of the Venice Commission in strengthening the Rule of Law. in Engelbrekt AB et al (2021) Rule of Law in the EU: 30 Years After the Fall of the Berlin Wall. Hart, Oxford 147–180