Modeling more software performance antipatterns in cyber-physical systems
-
Published:2023-12-20
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1619-1366
-
Container-title:Software and Systems Modeling
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Softw Syst Model
Author:
Pinciroli RiccardoORCID, Smith Connie U., Trubiani CatiaORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe design of cyber-physical systems (CPS) is challenging due to the heterogeneity of software and hardware components that operate in uncertain environments (e.g., fluctuating workloads), hence they are prone to performance issues. Software performance antipatterns could be a key means to tackle this challenge since they recognize design problems that may lead to unacceptable system performance. This manuscript focuses on modeling and analyzing a variegate set of software performance antipatterns with the goal of quantifying their performance impact on CPS. Starting from the specification of eight software performance antipatterns, we build a baseline queuing network performance model that is properly extended to account for the corresponding bad practices. The approach is applied to a CPS consisting of a network of sensors and experimental results show that performance degradation can be traced back to software performance antipatterns. Sensitivity analysis investigates the peculiar characteristics of antipatterns, such as the frequency of checking the status of resources, that provides quantitative information to software designers to help them identify potential performance problems and their root causes. Quantifying the performance impact of antipatterns on CPS paves the way for future work enabling the automated refactoring of systems to remove these bad practices.
Funder
Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Modeling and Simulation,Software
Reference61 articles.
1. Harman, M., O’Hearn, P.W.: From start-ups to scale-ups: opportunities and open problems for static and dynamic program analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM), pp. 1–23 (2018) 2. Stecklein, J.M., Dabney, J., Dick, B., Haskins, B., Lovell, R., Moroney, G.: Error cost escalation through the project life cycle. NASA technical report (2004) 3. Chen, T.-H., Shang, W., Jiang, Z.M., Hassan, A.E., Nasser, M., Flora, P.: Detecting performance anti-patterns for applications developed using object-relational mapping. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 1001–1012 (2014) 4. Kolesnikov, S.S., Siegmund, N., Kästner, C., Grebhahn, A., Apel, S.: Tradeoffs in modeling performance of highly configurable software systems. Softw. Syst. Model. 18(3), 2265–2283 (2019) 5. Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G.: Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)
|
|