Consensus statements on complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer—technical steps and training implications
-
Published:2022-07-05
Issue:8
Volume:36
Page:5595-5601
-
ISSN:0930-2794
-
Container-title:Surgical Endoscopy
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Surg Endosc
Author:
Tejedor Patricia, Francis Nader, Jayne David, Hohenberger Werner, Khan JimORCID, Tejedor Patricia, Francis Nader, Jayne David, Hohenberger Werner, Khan Jim, Ahmed Anwar, Abraham-igwe Chukwuma, Evans Charles, Miskovic Danilo, Pfeffer Frank, Tulina Inna, Coffey John Calvin, Campbell Kenneth, Gómez-Ruiz Marcos, West Nicholas Paul, Shihab Oliver, Bianchi Paolo Pietro, Coyne Peter Edward, Tsarkov Petr, Varghese Philip, Motson Roger W., Gerjy Roger, Tou Samson, Gill Talvinder Singh, Konishi Tsuyoshi, Ozben Volkan, Arezzo Alberto, Stevenson Andrew R. L., Lynch Andrew Craig, Min Byung Soh, Pastor Carlos, Bertelsen Claus Anders, Hahnloser Dieter, Ignjatovic Dejan, Spinoglio Giuseppe, Kessler Hermann, Hasegawa Hirotoshi, Okabayashi Koji, Boni Luigi, Morino Mario, Leitz Michael R., Crolla Rogier M. P. H., Croner Roland S., Kim Seon Hahn, Efetov Sergey K., Benz Stefan R., Niebisch Stefan, Panis Yves, Hiller Wolfgang F. A., Bemelman Willem, , , ,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
CME is a radical resection for colon cancer, but the procedure is technically demanding with significant variation in its practice. A standardised approach to the optimal technique and training is, therefore, desirable to minimise technical hazards and facilitate safe dissemination. The aim is to develop an expert consensus on the optimal technique for Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) for right-sided and transverse colon cancer to guide safe implementation and training pathways.
Methods
Guidance was developed following a modified Delphi process to draw consensus from 55 international experts in CME and surgical education representing 18 countries. Domain topics were formulated and subdivided into questions pertinent to different aspects of CME practice. A three-round Delphi voting on 25 statements based on the specific questions and 70% agreement was considered as consensus.
Results
Twenty-three recommendations for CME procedure were agreed on, describing the technique and optimal training pathway. CME is recommended as the standard of care resection for locally advanced colon cancer. The essential components are central vascular ligation, exposure of the superior mesenteric vein and excision of an intact mesocolon. Key anatomical landmarks to perform a safe CME dissection include identification of the ileocolic pedicle, superior mesenteric vein and root of the mesocolon. A proficiency-based multimodal training curriculum for CME was proposed including a formal proctorship programme.
Conclusions
Consensus on standardisation of technique and training framework for complete mesocolic excision was agreed upon by a panel of experts to guide current practice and provide a quality control framework for future studies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Heald RJ (1988) The “Holy Plane” of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81(9):503–508 2. Lee L, Erkan A, Alhassan N, Kelly JJ, Nassif GJ, Albert MR et al (2018) Lower survival after right-sided versus left-sided colon cancers: Is an extended lymphadenectomy the answer? Surg Oncol 27(3):449–455 3. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation–technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11(4):354–364 4. Lu JY, Xu L, Xue HD, Zhou WX, Xu T, Qiu HZ et al (2016) The Radical Extent of lymphadenectomy - D2 dissection versus complete mesocolic excision of LAparoscopic Right Colectomy for right-sided colon cancer (RELARC) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 17(1):582 5. Karachun A, Petrov A, Panaiotti L, Voschinin Y, Ovchinnikova T (2019) Protocol for a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing oncological outcomes of D2 versus D3 lymph node dissection in colonic cancer (COLD trial). BJS Open 3(3):288–298
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|